- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:26:03 -0700
- To: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- CC: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, HTML WG <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Ann Navarro wrote: > > > [speaking as an individual, not as an editor of XHTML 2.0] > > I believe you've done the community a grave disservice by issuing such a > succinct message of "in a unanimous decision, XHTML should do "X", > without any acknowledgement of such controversy and history. (I also > would request that the minutes of this discussion be posted in full (no > 'light editing' as to content) immediately. Hi Ann, I am editing the minutes as we speak. They will not be available immediately since the TAG has asked to review them first; they had already detected some bugs after the first day. > As others have suggested, any positioning of the TAG's opinion as a > potential binding decision upon W3C work, without having impacted groups > represented in the debate and discussion, is in my opinion, W3C process > run amok. Like TAG findings, this opinion from the TAG is not formally binding. - Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/07/19-tag -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 12:31:17 UTC