- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:14:47 -0500
- To: "'Svgdeveloper@aol.com'" <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>, www-tag@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 17:16:00 UTC
Yes. Just expect a slooooooooow uptake. I'm not sure everyone is quite considering the size of the legacy of hardcoded HTML in program files out here. The HTML tag soup legacy is a very large porridge now and we can't just dump the tureen into the river and start fresh. It's hard for me to conceive of an upgrade strategy that autofixes this. It will be interesting to see how the dominant browser vendor copes. The footprint size of IE is turning into a rock babe: fat bottomed, big hair, lots of makeup, and ready to fight. len -----Original Message----- From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com [mailto:Svgdeveloper@aol.com] :) ... Apologies for the typo. .... It's late here in the UK. My question, of course, was "Is XHTML worth persevering *with*?".
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 17:16:00 UTC