Simon St.Laurent wrote: > Norm Walsh writes: > >>Ok. I wrote the message and I'm anxious to apologize if its tone was >>the source of misunderstanding. I suppose I should have written a >>longer, more carefully crafted note. Ironically, the note was written >>in some haste because of concern (on the part of several of us) that >>if our conclusions only showed up in the minutes that it would look >>like we weren't being up front and our failure to say something >>explicit would be the source of bad feeling. Sigh. > > > Speaking of which, those minutes have not yet surfaced publicly, so far > as I can find, and there are lots of questions remaining about WHY the > TAG reached this conclusion. > > We don't even appear to have a "lightly-edited IRC log". The minutes are currently being reviewed by the TAG. I expect them to be publicly available (after corrections) early next week. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 13:48:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:54 UTC