- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 09:32:27 -0700
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Chris Lilley wrote: > > OK, suggested replacement text for the entire second paragraph in > the Fragment identifiers section. Its now four short paragraphs, one > for each example. In the first three, the fact that something in the > content is being pointed to is stressed; the secondary effect on the > presentation is then noted, in case people thought that linking > directly to the presentation was possible. The fourth paragraph is > the last sentence of the existing text, lightly edited to clarify > what I think it means. I am not an RDF expert and if I got that part > wrong, I am sure someone will correct me. Chris' replacement text is immensely more precise and thus better. It seems a bit longish, maybe we could get by with three rather than four examples but I'd be in favor of using it as a first step -Timm
Received on Sunday, 1 September 2002 12:32:24 UTC