Re: TAG Comments on XHTML 2.0 and HLink

At 12:28 PM 9/26/2002 -0400, Svgdeveloper@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 26/09/2002 17:12:07 GMT Daylight Time, ann@webgeek.com 
>writes:
>
>
>>XHTML 2.0 retains much of the familiar because that familiar is practical,
>>useful, and comfortable. There is no need to reinvent paragraphs, bulleted
>>lists, and other simple document structures.
>
>
>Ann,
>
>Not even if the paragraphs are structurally unlinked to any assumed header?

Andrew,

Could you finish reading the paragraph (or perhaps the draft before making 
assumptions)?

"the structural semantics of headings have been enforced."

-----
Ann Navarro, WebGeek, Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com

say what? http://www.snorf.net/blog

Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 13:05:03 UTC