- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 08:57:01 -0700
- To: <uri@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>, <ietf-types@iana.org>
The URI specification notes that the interpretation of a fragment identifier (the part of a URI reference after a '#') depends on the media type. However, the template for media type registration doesn't have a place to document the meaning of fragment identifiers within the media type. Originally, fragment identifiers were only used within HTML documents, so the point was somewhat moot. However, now there are several specifications -- mainly from the W3C -- that use fragment identifiers more explicitly, as well as proposals for changing or adding semantics for fragment identifiers for existing media types (such as a recent proposal for a fragment identifier for plain text.) Should the registration form for media types include a statement about the semantics of fragment identifiers for that media type? Is there a consistent policy or design for 'good' fragment identifier use? Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 11:56:46 UTC