draft-wilde-text-fragment-01 (was: Including 'fragment identifier semantics' ...)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Dan Kohn wrote:
> It would also be worth noting and/or commenting on this draft:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wilde-text-fragment-01

Yuch. This is overcomplicated and not sufficiently useful to justify the
risk of security flaws in parsing regular expressions. There's a good
case for supporting a simple "#<line-number>" syntax for text/plain, but
nothing more IMHO.

- -- 
David Hopwood <david.hopwood@zetnet.co.uk>

Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/
RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5  0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01
Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a
public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been
seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBPXe8zTkCAxeYt5gVAQEzLgf/VxDz2nCDGIg3dfiIG1BBWydszNQhEpeM
jrZvcsSgoc5DnQkpI+BjDNXFd3JaXSw25JBdxeqgTWxN3p+WSFsuOQTiUZekoac+
RIPZ0vtxvwsmeJ33Bb5k7VKS/dk61N+sgm+acGc5zUvFv3D+4aPcd9zTIFQTvaed
qqwcEdQG4MYVLy9/mENAkxTH2I3C9K4IuoPDwQzho0YJ6wzB7qfEEa3qo3upw49G
83TZUInTfGz8UyDYOU7Iua/ICiMSUjpzTfo8vjndpBpD9iLvYrSXYFzulO2iMDJT
QpBfBl99PVnU25DXuxFuA2Fs1z7Yuk4MVsIMIinZUCQEoQfzQQ99JQ==
=+j0H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 03:22:00 UTC