- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 21:03:32 +0200
- To: "Matthew Wilson" <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk>, <www-tag@w3.org>
- Cc: <clbullar@ingr.com>
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of > Matthew Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 8:38 PM > To: www-tag@w3.org > Cc: clbullar@ingr.com > Subject: RE: URI denumerability > > > > > >Cantor rants are fun but precisely > >what is one trying to prove/clarify > >with that? > > Well, it means that the real numbers (or anything of the same magnitude) > cannot be identified by URIs. So either there are resources which ...not all of them... > cannot be > assigned URIs, or there are things we can talk about and meaningfully > describe which are not resources. Really? Once you talk about a *specific* real number, I can trivially assign a URI to that number. > I don't know whether that is a problem or not. I think it just shows an interesting property of non-denumerability. -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 15:04:08 UTC