- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:07:36 -0700
- To: www-tag@w3.org
I got around to reading the latest RDF Concepts WD (http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-concepts-20020829/) and found the following in sect 2.4.2. "Some URIrefs may indicate web resources, and a node thus labelled is presumed to denote that resource. Other URIrefs may represent abstract ideas or values rather than a retreivable [sic] Web resource. " Hmm; so RDF officially doesn't believe in a 1-1 mapping between URI references and resources? Or does the notion of a "retrievable Web resource" need formalizing as a subclass of Resource? -Tim
Received on Friday, 20 September 2002 15:07:41 UTC