- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:19:43 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Andrew Watt writes: > Isn't it all the more odd that Ann wrote, "XHTML 2.0 retains much of > the familiar because that familiar is practical, useful, and > comfortable. There is no need to reinvent paragraphs, bulleted lists, > and other simple document structures. " when, in fact, they are ... > at least as far as structure is concerned .... potentially going to > be significantly altered? I think you've mistaken a minor tweak for a major architectural change. People have used divs for sections for years, and complained that there was no good way to indicate a headline in that structure. This is pretty trivial stuff. > I wonder if the HTML user community will be at least as concerned > about those changes as the supposed concern about XLink. :) I doubt it. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 13:19:44 UTC