W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2002

Re: two failings of XLink

From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:48:15 -0400
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <r01050300-1015-C5AD8704D21F11D685CC0003937A08C2@[]>

Elliotte Rusty Harold writes:
> >The img element is an element, whether it has an empty tag or a
> >start tag and and an end tag.  If it contains child elements, or is
> >wrapped in other elements, I count that as a multiple-element
> >solution, not just a multi-tag solution.
> An img element is one element. This one element may contain other 
> elements. If these other elements contain URIs, then the img element 
> also contains URIs.

So apparently you're counting an img element that contains 10 child
elements as a single element, whereas I'm seeing 11 elements total

I don't think that's anything to do with tags, but at least the
different approaches to counting are clear.

Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid: is another possibility altogether
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 09:48:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:54 UTC