[Bug 15209] Provide authors with a way to handle running out of buffers, if that turns out to ever actually happen in practice
[Bug 15209] Provide authors with a way to handle running out of buffers, if that turns out to ever actually happen in practice
[Bug 15210] Consider dispatching an event when bufferedAmount drops to 0
[web-components] Typos
[shadow-dom] text-decoration
pointerLock vendor prefixes, shims and usability
IndexedDB: IDBOpenDBRequest sequencing
[Bug 20480] New: Say something about keys
[Bug 15254] Don't forbid underscore in host names in URLs
[ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
[Bug 11379] [pending URL spec] definition of hierarchical URL inconsistent with rfc 3986
[Bug 20394] New: [IndexedDB] Spec should use WebIDL concepts such as sequence<T> rather than Array
RfC: LCWD of "Ambient Light Events"; deadline 26 January 2012
[XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- RE: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
Selectors API L1 is a Proposed Recommendation
Nov 2012 edition of "Standards for Web Applications on Mobile: current state and roadmap"
Review of the <template> spec
- Re: Review of the <template> spec
- Re: Review of the <template> spec
- Re: Review of the <template> spec
Please add constructors for File and FileList
Call for Review: Web IDL Testing document
[Bug 20322] New: Document the force preflight flag
[WebIDL] Representing functions that user code can call
[admin] Off-Topic Discussion Policy
RfR: Proximity Events (DAP) Last Call
[Bug 20257] New: IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
- Re: IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
- Re: IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
- Re: IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
[webcomponents] Custom Components and CSS Regions
DOM Level 3 Events - minor comments
[IndexedDB] Closing connection in a versionchange transaction
[selectors-api] Matching of :scope in document.querySelector(All)
- Re: [selectors-api] Matching of :scope in document.querySelector(All)
- Re: [selectors-api] Matching of :scope in document.querySelector(All)
Re: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries...
- Re: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries...
- RE: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries...
[Bug 20148] New: URLQuery interface does not handle query parameter ordering
[Bug 14694] innerHTML in DocumentFragment
[IndexedDB] Straw man proposal for moving spec along TR track
[Bug 14842] Update createContextualFragment if detached flag is removed
[Bug 14842] Update createContextualFragment if detached flag is removed
Re: Colliding FileWriters
[pointer-lock] pointerLockElement should be nullable in the IDL
[Bug 17974] appcache: Add an API to make appcache support caching specific URLs dynamically (and/or a JS "server" or "interceptor" for uncached resources?)
CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2
- Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2
- Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2
- Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2
[Bug 18866] Make it clear that localStorage can be cleared by UA at will
[Bug 10326] make "user:password" in URLs a SYNTAX_ERR
CfC: publish WD of Screen Orientation; deadline November 30
[admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
[Bug 20045] New: data: URLs, HTTP, and parsing
CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- RE: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- RE: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- RE: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
[XHR] Associating XHR instances with documents - clarify spec statement in 4.6.1
[Bug 13681] Make FormData.append return the FormData object
[Bug 16309] meaning of "user interferes with the request"?
[Bug 16295] clarify intention of early termination of abort/send
[Bug 20038] New: Upgrade FormData
RfR: CORS tests - deadline 6 December
Editor change for "Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs" specification
[fyi] Minutes from Technical Plenary meeting at TPAC 2012
[admin] Publishing specs before EoY; CfC start deadline is December 2
[IndexedDB] coupled transactions
[IndexedDB] Can IDBTransaction.oncomplete callback be used as active state?
Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
random numbers API
CfC: Selectors API Level 1 Test Suite; deadline November 23
[PE] Start working on Progress Events
FileSystem compromise spec
Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation
[css3-conditional] Last Call Working Draft for @supports and CSS.supports()
[selectors-api] Editoral Changes and Test Suite Progress
[Bug 19969] New: clarify some user name/password and setRequestHeader() Authorize header issues
Put request need created flag
CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Server-Sent Events; deadline November 21
[Bug 19955] New: [IndexedDB] Add IDBObjectStore.openKeyCursor
IDBObjectStore require openKeyCursor method
Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
[XHR] ED update
Making offline apps easier?
- RE: Making offline apps easier?
- Re: Making offline apps easier?
- Re: Making offline apps easier?
- Re: Making offline apps easier?
Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Widget Updates; deadline May 2
[Bug 14828] Import Hixie's tests?
[Bug 19917] New: Split fullscreenchange event to two separate events
[IndexedDB] Attributes with undefined vs. null
[webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
[Bug 19878] New: Revert change in Close-reason-unpaired-surrogates.htm ?
[screen-orient] Updated editor draft
[WebIDL] Typo in platform array object [[GetOwnProperty]] method
Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
CSP 1.1 DOM design
[Bug 19831] New: Investigate overrideMimeType()
WebApps' File: Writer & File: D&S specs and SysApps' File System and Media Storage specs
Re: ACTION-669: Work with PLH on an announcement seeking IRC fragments (Web Applications Working Group)
[webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
Draft Minutes: 30 October 2012
[Clipboard API] The before* events
- Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
[webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- RE: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
Re: [quota-api] Need for session storage type
[Bug 19773] New: Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
Event.key complaints?
Draft Minutes: 29 October 2012
[selectors-api] Reference to obsolete ECMAScript Language spec version
[Bug 19752] New: Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
[Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
[webappsec] CORS bug 19315
[Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
Re: CFC Selectors API L1 to CR/PR
[Bug 18647] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
Hello From Bo (China Unicom)
Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
RfC: LCWD of Server-sent Events; deadline November 13
[selectors-api] Updated Testsuite
[IDB] Lifetime of IDB objects
[widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
[widgets] XML Digital Signatures for Widgets REC Delayed until at least January 2013
[Bug 18653] wrong bug tracker link
[Bug 18188] "relevant namespace object" is not defined in WebIDL anymore.
[Bug 18218] Within the workers text "list of active intervals" can be removed because it is the same as "list of active timers".
[Bug 18080] "This specification introduces two related mechanisms, similar to HTTP session cookies, for storing structured data on the client side." - structured data is no longer supported
[Bug 18033] each MessageChannel acts as its own task source. This means that messages sent using this function are not guaranteed to execute in order, since the order task sources are processed isn't specified.
[Bug 18610] Transferable should expose a close() method
[webcomponents] Progress Update
Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
[Bug 19570] New: Editorial: typo U+00A (missing a 0)
[Bug 19003] Bugs in toNativeLineEndings()
[Bug 17758] Consider using microtasks for autorevoke
[Bug 16953] createObjectURL and oneTimeOnly behavior should be defined in terms of stable state
[Bug 17758] Consider using microtasks for autorevoke
Call for Editor: Progress Events REC track spec
[admin] New public IRC server refuses passwords
[Bug 18529] Existence of separators in token should throw SyntaxError
[Bug 18528] Spec is unclear about the case sensitivity of parameter values
[Bug 18523] Spec is unclear about the restriction on LWS in the attribute/value in the ABNF for media-type
[Bug 18521] Spec is unclear about lower-casing content types
[Bug 19540] New: Firing WebStorage storage event
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
HTML 5 should include a way to create custom page header & footer for printing.
URL work in HTML 5
full screen api
- Re: full screen api
- Re: full screen api
- Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- RE: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- RE: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- RE: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: full screen api
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
[Bug 15994] origin attribute
[Bug 19470] New: Event firing sequence on abort() after send()
Fwd: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- RE: RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: RE: RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
A little introduction
[Bug 14773] Investigate if synchronous XHR in window context should not support new XHR responseTypes
CfC: publish LCWD of Server-sent Events; deadline Oct 18
[Bug 16707] user/password set to undefined means missing
[Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
[clipops] still not clear about event loop
[Bug 18796] HTTP 204 not specified
Re: [Server-Sent Events] Infinite reconnection clarification
[Bug 15495] Update EventSource model to do automatic reconnect even in the face of network errors
[Bug 19450] New: [IndexedDB] Key path segments should permit reserved words
Re: Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[IndexeddDB] Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison need to be tightened up
IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
[announce] WebPlatform Docs: community resource for Web developers and designers
[Bug 18772] Should getAllResponseHeaders() end with \r\n?
[Bug 17222] treat status code 308 consistently with 301, 302, and 307
[Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
[XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
Reminder: F2F meeting Oct 29-30 in Lyon France; registration deadline Oct 16
Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19
[XHR]
[Bug 16302] possible unnecessary insertion of U+0020 SPACE in mime type expression
RE: [IndexedDB] Implementation Discrepancies on 'prevunique' and 'nextunique' on index cursor
[Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- Re: [Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Pointer Lock; deadline Oct 4
CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
Re: [push-api] Moving Push API to FPWD [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
[Bug 19283] New: Investigate IDNA2003 separators
Registration for Test the Web Forward Paris is now open!
Re: [selectors-api] Kudos on find/findAll, feedback on spec readability
Re: [quota-api] API change suggestions
Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- RE: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
CfC: publish WD of Shadow DOM; deadline Oct 10
[WebIDL] Interface object prototype and function object
- Re: [WebIDL] Interface object prototype and function object
- Re: [WebIDL] Interface object prototype and function object
[IndexedDB] Implementation Discrepancies on 'prevunique' and 'nextunique' on index cursor
Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]