- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 07:34:07 -0400
- To: ext Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com>
- CC: EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA <efc@tid.es>, "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>, "public-webapps@w3c.org" <public-webapps@w3c.org>
On 10/5/12 7:06 AM, ext Bryan Sullivan wrote: > - more info on serverProtocols It still seems like the set of valid strings will need to be defined. Perhaps at this point, it would be sufficient if a related Issue Block was added. (I'll ask Mike to create a Bugzilla component for the spec.) > - additional references (I still need to update the respec biblio) Yes, please do as this must be fixed before the FPWD is actually published in /TR/. (Robin provided some related info in [1].) > I would like to request a CFC for FPWD publication, if there are no more > substantive comments on the updated version. I will start a CfC for the FPWD. (If you haven't prepared a doc for publication as a TR, please see <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/SpecEditing> for some information about the PubRules and such.) -Thanks, AB [1] <http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20121005> >>>> * serverProtocols - what are the expectations for the "valid" set of >>>> values; where are they specified? >>>> >>> Good question. We need some means of registration of well-known services >>> so the protocols can be recognized. >>>
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 11:34:33 UTC