- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:36:21 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19969 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 19969 CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org Assignee: annevk@annevk.nl Summary: clarify some user name/password and setRequestHeader() Authorize header issues QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux Reporter: hallvord@opera.com Hardware: PC Status: NEW Version: unspecified Component: XHR Product: WebAppsWG IMO we should clarify the following: 1) Add a note (maybe just informative?) saying user name / password from open() method will only be sent to a site if it first uses a 401 response to indicate that authentication is required. 2) Figure out what should happen if a script calls open() with user name/password arguments, then sets an Authorize header with setRequestHeader(). Which wins? Will it depend on whether the site says 401 or not? (IMO: setRequestHeader() should win if this is compatible with implementations, simplifies things. Whether or not there is a 401 response should make no difference. Hope that's sufficiently aligned with implementations..) 3) I assume that if setRequestHeader() adds an Authorize header, it's sent to the server whether or not a 401 request has been returned. Perhaps this should also be noted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:36:23 UTC