- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:12:36 -0400
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 10/9/12 1:52 PM, Joshua Bell wrote: > The IDB spec does not have [TreatUndefinedAs=Missing] specified on > openCursor()'s arguments (or anywhere else), so I believe Chrome's > behavior here is correct. It looks correct as the spec is currently written. It's not clear to me why the spec is written the way it is. It could just as easily define that if the "any" value is undefined, it's ignored. Or it could use [TreatUndefinedAs=Missing], indeed. -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 18:13:08 UTC