- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 01:43:58 +0800
- To: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
(12/11/24 1:28), Adam Barth wrote: >> Now, that being said and seeing as we cannot put Anne as an editor of the >> W3C version of the spec (because, technically, he's not). How do you guys >> suggest we go about acknowledging the WHATWG source? Where in the spec? How? >> With what kind of wording? > > I would recommend acknowledging the WHATWG upfront in the Status of > this Document. The document currently reads: > > ---8<--- > This document is produced by the Web Applications (WebApps) Working > Group. The WebApps Working Group is part of the Rich Web Clients > Activity in the W3C Interaction Domain. > --->8--- Just in case folks don't know. HTML5 also has a paragraph like this in the Status of this Document: # The bulk of the text of this specification is also available in the # WHATWG HTML Living Standard, under a license that permits reuse of # the specification text. Another possibility is to say something like | Anne van Kesteran authored most of the text in the spec. in the Acknowledgment section. I'd note that in CSS specs an Acknowledgment section is not always just a list of names and so suppose this is doable. I'm not pushing for this though, as I find this quite obvious. > Perhaps Anne would be willing to suggest some text that he would find > appropriate? +1, or perhaps Anne would like to object to this CfC no matter what? Cheers, Kenny -- Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Friday, 23 November 2012 17:44:33 UTC