- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 17:26:54 +0100
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: Hajime Morrita <morrita@google.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, "public-webapps@w3.org WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Hajime Morrita <morrita@google.com> wrote: >> A naive proposal: Can we introduce an alias of <script> element, like >> <scr>, and ask template authors to use <scr> instead of <script> inside >> <script template>? Since <scr> is just an alias of <script>, authors can >> use it even outside <script template>. > > The problem is then that you can't have doubly nested templates because > <scr> wouldn't be able to nest inside itself. Obvious solution: allow <scrip>, <scri>, <scr>, and <sc>. 5 levels of nesting should be enough for anyone. </troll> ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 16:27:42 UTC