Re: Re: Event.key complaints?

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Travis Leithead <
travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote:

>  >> When were you thinking of kicking off the DOM4 Events process?****
>
> ** **
>
> I'd like to have a draft up this week. We may also ask for a FPWD if we're
> ready by the 10th. ****
>
> ** **
>
> I want to have D4E rolling so that stuff we chose to punt from D3E has a
> landing pad.
>

+1

This will make things a lot smoother for D3E I think and allows us to avoid
stalling all DOM Event spec work while we try to finalize D3E.


> ****
>
> *From:* garykac@google.com [mailto:garykac@google.com] *On Behalf Of *Gary
> Kacmarcik (?????????)
> *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 6:09 PM
> *To:* Travis Leithead
> *Cc:* Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen; public-webapps@w3.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Event.key complaints?****
>
>  ** **
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Travis Leithead <
> travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote:****
>
>  Awesome stuff Gary.****
>
>  ****
>
> (And I like that we won't need to change the behavior of key or char in
> your proposal—that part made me really nervous, since IE has shipped this
> stuff since 9, and I know our new Win8 app model is using it.)****
>
>  ****
>
> I'm planning in the short term to start a new DOM4 Events spec, which will
> be the successor to DOM3 Events. I brought this up at TPAC and there were
> no objections. Gary, I'd love you collaboration on specifying your new
> "code" property in that spec.****
>
>  ** **
>
> Sounds good to me.  I still have some comments to make on the DOM3 Events
> spec, but I'll still send them out knowing that some of them will need to
> be punted to DOM4.****
>
> ** **
>
> When were you thinking of kicking off the DOM4 Events process?****
>
> ** **
>
> -Gary****
>
> ** **
>