Monday, 31 December 2012
- [Bug 15209] Provide authors with a way to handle running out of buffers, if that turns out to ever actually happen in practice
- [Bug 15209] Provide authors with a way to handle running out of buffers, if that turns out to ever actually happen in practice
- [Bug 15210] Consider dispatching an event when bufferedAmount drops to 0
Sunday, 30 December 2012
Friday, 28 December 2012
Thursday, 27 December 2012
Monday, 24 December 2012
- Re: pointerLock vendor prefixes, shims and usability
- Re: pointerLock vendor prefixes, shims and usability
- Re: pointerLock vendor prefixes, shims and usability
- pointerLock vendor prefixes, shims and usability
Friday, 21 December 2012
- Re: Review of the <template> spec
- Re: Review of the <template> spec
- IndexedDB: IDBOpenDBRequest sequencing
- [Bug 20480] New: Say something about keys
- [Bug 19283] Investigate IDNA2003 separators
- [Bug 15254] Don't forbid underscore in host names in URLs
Thursday, 20 December 2012
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
Tuesday, 18 December 2012
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- Re: [ambient light events LC] Feedback
- [ambient light events LC] Feedback
Saturday, 15 December 2012
Friday, 14 December 2012
- Re: Review of the <template> spec
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- [Bug 20394] New: [IndexedDB] Spec should use WebIDL concepts such as sequence<T> rather than Array
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- RfC: LCWD of "Ambient Light Events"; deadline 26 January 2012
- RE: [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Re: Review of the <template> spec
Thursday, 13 December 2012
- Re: Review of the <template> spec
- [XHR] Need to define the behavior when the Window the XHR is created from does not have an associated document
- Selectors API L1 is a Proposed Recommendation
- Re: Review of the <template> spec
- Re: IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
Wednesday, 12 December 2012
Tuesday, 11 December 2012
- Re: FileSystem compromise spec
- Re: IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
- Review of the <template> spec
Monday, 10 December 2012
- Please add constructors for File and FileList
- Re: [IndexedDB] Straw man proposal for moving spec along TR track
- Re: [WebIDL] Representing functions that user code can call
- Call for Review: Web IDL Testing document
- [Bug 20322] New: Document the force preflight flag
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Components and CSS Regions
- Re: [WebIDL] Representing functions that user code can call
- Re: [WebIDL] Representing functions that user code can call
Sunday, 9 December 2012
- Re: [WebIDL] Representing functions that user code can call
- Re: [WebIDL] Representing functions that user code can call
Saturday, 8 December 2012
Friday, 7 December 2012
Thursday, 6 December 2012
- Re: RfR: Proximity Events (DAP) Last Call
- Re: RfR: Proximity Events (DAP) Last Call
- RfR: Proximity Events (DAP) Last Call
- Re: [webcomponents] Custom Components and CSS Regions
- Re: IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
Wednesday, 5 December 2012
- [Bug 20257] IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
- [Bug 20257] New: IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
- Re: IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
- IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
- [webcomponents] Custom Components and CSS Regions
Tuesday, 4 December 2012
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- DOM Level 3 Events - minor comments
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
Monday, 3 December 2012
- RE: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries...
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: Re: Event.key complaints?
- RE: Re: Event.key complaints?
- Re: [selectors-api] Matching of :scope in document.querySelector(All)
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: [selectors-api] Matching of :scope in document.querySelector(All)
Sunday, 2 December 2012
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
Friday, 30 November 2012
Sunday, 2 December 2012
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
Saturday, 1 December 2012
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: Re: Event.key complaints?
- RE: Re: Event.key complaints?
Friday, 30 November 2012
- [IndexedDB] Closing connection in a versionchange transaction
- Re: Re: Event.key complaints?
- [Bug 20148] URLQuery interface does not handle query parameter ordering
- RE: FileSystem compromise spec
- Re: FileSystem compromise spec
- [selectors-api] Matching of :scope in document.querySelector(All)
- Re: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries...
- Re: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries...
Thursday, 29 November 2012
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
- Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2
- [Bug 20148] New: URLQuery interface does not handle query parameter ordering
Wednesday, 28 November 2012
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- [Bug 14694] innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- [IndexedDB] Straw man proposal for moving spec along TR track
- [Bug 14842] Update createContextualFragment if detached flag is removed
- [Bug 14842] Update createContextualFragment if detached flag is removed
- Re: Colliding FileWriters
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
- Re: [pointer-lock] pointerLockElement should be nullable in the IDL
- [pointer-lock] pointerLockElement should be nullable in the IDL
- Re: CfC: Selectors API Level 1 Test Suite; deadline November 23
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- RE: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
Monday, 26 November 2012
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- [admin] Consistent Boilerplate and Status sections for EDs [Was: Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2]
- Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- RE: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: Editor change for "Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs" specification
- Re: Editor change for "Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs" specification
- Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- RE: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- [Bug 17974] appcache: Add an API to make appcache support caching specific URLs dynamically (and/or a JS "server" or "interceptor" for uncached resources?)
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
Sunday, 25 November 2012
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Server-Sent Events; deadline November 21
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2
- Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2
- Re: CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2
- CfC: publish WD of DOM; deadline December 2
- [Bug 18866] Make it clear that localStorage can be cleared by UA at will
Saturday, 24 November 2012
Friday, 23 November 2012
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- Re: [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- CfC: publish WD of Screen Orientation; deadline November 30
- [admin] XHR ED Boilerplate
- RE: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
Thursday, 22 November 2012
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- [Bug 20045] New: data: URLs, HTTP, and parsing
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: Re: [XHR] Associating XHR instances with documents - clarify spec statement in 4.6.1
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: Re: [XHR] Associating XHR instances with documents - clarify spec statement in 4.6.1
- Re: Re: [XHR] Associating XHR instances with documents - clarify spec statement in 4.6.1
- Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29
- Re: [XHR] Associating XHR instances with documents - clarify spec statement in 4.6.1
- [XHR] Associating XHR instances with documents - clarify spec statement in 4.6.1
- Re: RfR: CORS tests - deadline 6 December
Wednesday, 21 November 2012
- [Bug 13681] Make FormData.append return the FormData object
- [Bug 16309] meaning of "user interferes with the request"?
- [Bug 16295] clarify intention of early termination of abort/send
- [Bug 20038] New: Upgrade FormData
- RfR: CORS tests - deadline 6 December
- Editor change for "Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs" specification
Tuesday, 20 November 2012
- [fyi] Minutes from Technical Plenary meeting at TPAC 2012
- RE: [IndexedDB] coupled transactions
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
Monday, 19 November 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] coupled transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Can IDBTransaction.oncomplete callback be used as active state?
- [admin] Publishing specs before EoY; CfC start deadline is December 2
Sunday, 18 November 2012
- [IndexedDB] coupled transactions
- [IndexedDB] Can IDBTransaction.oncomplete callback be used as active state?
Saturday, 17 November 2012
Friday, 16 November 2012
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: exposing CANVAS or something like it to Web Workers
- Re: random numbers API
- Re: random numbers API
- Re: random numbers API
- Re: random numbers API
- Re: random numbers API
- Re: random numbers API
- Re: random numbers API
- Re: random numbers API
- Re: random numbers API
- Re: random numbers API
- Re: random numbers API
- random numbers API
- Re: [admin] Publication Rules [Was Re: Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation]
- [admin] Publication Rules [Was Re: Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation]
- Re: Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation
- Re: [PE] interface MessageEvent : ProgressEvent
- CfC: Selectors API Level 1 Test Suite; deadline November 23
- [PE] interface MessageEvent : ProgressEvent
- [PE] Start working on Progress Events
- FileSystem compromise spec
Thursday, 15 November 2012
- Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation
- [css3-conditional] Last Call Working Draft for @supports and CSS.supports()
- [css-regions] Fwd: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- [selectors-api] Editoral Changes and Test Suite Progress
- [Bug 19969] clarify some user name/password and setRequestHeader() Authorize header issues
- [Bug 19969] New: clarify some user name/password and setRequestHeader() Authorize header issues
- Re: [selectors-api] Reference to obsolete ECMAScript Language spec version
Wednesday, 14 November 2012
- Re: Put request need created flag
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Put request need created flag
- CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Server-Sent Events; deadline November 21
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
Wednesday, 14 November 2012
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- Re: Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
- Re: Making offline apps easier?
- Re: Making offline apps easier?
- Re: IDBObjectStore require openKeyCursor method
- [Bug 19955] [IndexedDB] Add IDBObjectStore.openKeyCursor
- [Bug 19955] New: [IndexedDB] Add IDBObjectStore.openKeyCursor
Monday, 12 November 2012
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
- Feedback and questions on shadow DOM and web components
- [XHR] ED update
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Widget Updates; deadline May 2
Monday, 12 November 2012
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Making offline apps easier?
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- RE: Making offline apps easier?
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Making offline apps easier?
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Mail List Etiquette [Was: Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist]
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
- Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist
Friday, 9 November 2012
Sunday, 11 November 2012
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Widget Updates; deadline May 2
- Re: CFC Selectors API L1 to CR/PR
Friday, 9 November 2012
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- [Bug 14828] Import Hixie's tests?
- [Bug 19917] Split fullscreenchange event into two separate events
- [Bug 19917] New: Split fullscreenchange event to two separate events
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
Thursday, 8 November 2012
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: Re: Event.key complaints?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] Attributes with undefined vs. null
- [IndexedDB] Attributes with undefined vs. null
- Re: [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
- [webcomponents]: Changing API from constructable ShadowRoot to factory-like
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: Event.key complaints?
- Re: W3C document license [Was: Re: Call for Editor: URL spec]
- [Bug 19878] New: Revert change in Close-reason-unpaired-surrogates.htm ?
- W3C document license [Was: Re: Call for Editor: URL spec]
- Giving Credit Where Credit is Due [Was: Re: Call for Editor: URL spec]
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: Re: Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
Monday, 5 November 2012
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: [screen-orient] Updated editor draft
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: CSP 1.1 DOM design
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: [quota-api] Need for session storage type
- Re: [quota-api] Need for session storage type
- Re: [screen-orient] Updated editor draft
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- [screen-orient] Updated editor draft
- Re: Re: Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- [WebIDL] Typo in platform array object [[GetOwnProperty]] method
- Re: CSP 1.1 DOM design
- Re: [quota-api] Need for session storage type
- Re: CSP 1.1 DOM design
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: CSP 1.1 DOM design
- Re: CSP 1.1 DOM design
- Call for Editor: URL spec
- Re: CSP 1.1 DOM design
- Re: CSP 1.1 DOM design
- Re: CSP 1.1 DOM design
Sunday, 4 November 2012
Saturday, 3 November 2012
Friday, 2 November 2012
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- [Bug 19831] New: Investigate overrideMimeType()
- Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
Thursday, 1 November 2012
- Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- Re: Event.key complaints?
- Re: Event.key complaints?
- Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- RE: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- RE: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: WebApps' File: Writer & File: D&S specs and SysApps' File System and Media Storage specs
- WebApps' File: Writer & File: D&S specs and SysApps' File System and Media Storage specs
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: FW: Draft Minutes: 29 October 2012
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- RE: Event.key complaints?
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: Event.key complaints?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- RE: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: ACTION-669: Work with PLH on an announcement seeking IRC fragments (Web Applications Working Group)
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
Wednesday, 31 October 2012
- [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable
- Re: [Clipboard API] The before* events
- Re: Event.key complaints?
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: [quota-api] Need for session storage type
Tuesday, 30 October 2012
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: [quota-api] Need for session storage type
- Re: [quota-api] Need for session storage type
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Draft Minutes: 30 October 2012
- [Clipboard API] The before* events
- [webcomponents] More backward-compatible templates
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: [quota-api] Need for session storage type
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: [quota-api] API change suggestions
- [Bug 19773] New: Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Re: Pre-fetch rough draft
- Pre-fetch rough draft
Monday, 29 October 2012
- Event.key complaints?
- FW: Draft Minutes: 29 October 2012
- Draft Minutes: 29 October 2012
- [selectors-api] Reference to obsolete ECMAScript Language spec version
- [Bug 19752] New: Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing
Saturday, 27 October 2012
- Re: [webappsec] CORS bug 19315
- [Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
Friday, 26 October 2012
- [webappsec] CORS bug 19315
- [Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
- Re: CFC Selectors API L1 to CR/PR
Thursday, 25 October 2012
Wednesday, 24 October 2012
Tuesday, 23 October 2012
- Re: Should MutationObservers be able to observe work done by the HTML parser?
- RfC: LCWD of Server-sent Events; deadline November 13
Monday, 22 October 2012
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: CfC: publish WD - NOT LCWD of File API; deadline October 22
- Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
- Re: [IDB] Lifetime of IDB objects
- Re: [selectors-api] Updated Testsuite
- Re: [selectors-api] Updated Testsuite
- Re: [selectors-api] Updated Testsuite
- Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
- [selectors-api] Updated Testsuite
- Re: [IDB] Lifetime of IDB objects
- [IDB] Lifetime of IDB objects
Friday, 19 October 2012
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
Saturday, 20 October 2012
- [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
- [widgets] XML Digital Signatures for Widgets REC Delayed until at least January 2013
Friday, 19 October 2012
- [Bug 18653] wrong bug tracker link
- [Bug 18188] "relevant namespace object" is not defined in WebIDL anymore.
- [Bug 18218] Within the workers text "list of active intervals" can be removed because it is the same as "list of active timers".
- [Bug 18080] "This specification introduces two related mechanisms, similar to HTTP session cookies, for storing structured data on the client side." - structured data is no longer supported
- [Bug 18033] each MessageChannel acts as its own task source. This means that messages sent using this function are not guaranteed to execute in order, since the order task sources are processed isn't specified.
- [Bug 18610] Transferable should expose a close() method
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- RE: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
Thursday, 18 October 2012
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- [webcomponents] Progress Update
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- Re: Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
- Scheduling multiple types of end-of-(micro)task work
Wednesday, 17 October 2012
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- [Bug 19570] Editorial: typo U+00A (missing a 0)
- RE: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of File API; deadline October 22
- Re: RE: RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- RE: RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- [Bug 19570] New: Editorial: typo U+00A (missing a 0)
- Re: RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- CfC: publish LCWD of File API; deadline October 22
- Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15
- [Bug 19003] Bugs in toNativeLineEndings()
Tuesday, 16 October 2012
- RE: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- [Bug 17758] Consider using microtasks for autorevoke
- [Bug 16953] createObjectURL and oneTimeOnly behavior should be defined in terms of stable state
- [Bug 17758] Consider using microtasks for autorevoke
- Re: Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Call for Editor: Progress Events REC track spec
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
Monday, 15 October 2012
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- RE: CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
- RE: full screen api
- [admin] New public IRC server refuses passwords
- [Bug 18529] Existence of separators in token should throw SyntaxError
- [Bug 18528] Spec is unclear about the case sensitivity of parameter values
- [Bug 18523] Spec is unclear about the restriction on LWS in the attribute/value in the ABNF for media-type
- [Bug 18521] Spec is unclear about lower-casing content types
- Re: HTML 5 should include a way to create custom page header & footer for printing.
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- [Bug 19540] New: Firing WebStorage storage event
- RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: full screen api
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
Sunday, 14 October 2012
- HTML 5 should include a way to create custom page header & footer for printing.
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: full screen api
- Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15
Saturday, 13 October 2012
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- URL work in HTML 5
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Defenses against phishing via the fullscreen api (was Re: full screen api)
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: full screen api
Friday, 12 October 2012
- Re: full screen api
- full screen api
- [Bug 15994] origin attribute
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
Thursday, 11 October 2012
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: Fwd: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- [Bug 19470] New: Event firing sequence on abort() after send()
- Fwd: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- A little introduction
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- [Bug 14773] Investigate if synchronous XHR in window context should not support new XHR responseTypes
- CfC: publish LCWD of Server-sent Events; deadline Oct 18
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- [Bug 16707] user/password set to undefined means missing
- [Bug 17242] Consider doing anonymous requests as a constructor argument rather than as a separate constructor
- RE: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- [clipops] still not clear about event loop
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- [Bug 18796] HTTP 204 not specified
Wednesday, 10 October 2012
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: [Server-Sent Events] Infinite reconnection clarification
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- [Bug 15495] Update EventSource model to do automatic reconnect even in the face of network errors
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- [Bug 19450] New: [IndexedDB] Key path segments should permit reserved words
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: Proposal to add USB keycodes to the current DOM3 key events
Tuesday, 9 October 2012
Wednesday, 10 October 2012
Tuesday, 9 October 2012
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15
- Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15
- Re: [IndexeddDB] Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison need to be tightened up
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- [IndexeddDB] Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison need to be tightened up
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- [announce] WebPlatform Docs: community resource for Web developers and designers
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- [Bug 18772] Should getAllResponseHeaders() end with \r\n?
- [Bug 17222] treat status code 308 consistently with 301, 302, and 307
- [Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR]
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- [XHR] Open issue: allow setting User-Agent?
- Re: [Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- Re: [Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- Re: [Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- Reminder: F2F meeting Oct 29-30 in Lyon France; registration deadline Oct 16
- Re: [Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- Re: [Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- Re: [Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- Re: [Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- RE: CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
Monday, 8 October 2012
- Re: [XHR]
- Re: [XHR]
- Re: [XHR]
- Re: [XHR]
- Re: [XHR]
- Re: [XHR]
- Re: [XHR]
- Re: [XHR]
- Re: [selectors-api] RfC: LCWD of Selectors API Level 1; deadline July 19
- RE: [XHR]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implementation Discrepancies on 'prevunique' and 'nextunique' on index cursor
- Re: [XHR]
- Re: [XHR]
Saturday, 6 October 2012
- [XHR]
- [admin] Publish Early, Publish Often [Was: Re: publish WD of Shadow DOM; deadline Oct 10]
- [admin] Some points about WebApps' Work Mode [Was: Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Pointer Lock; deadline Oct 4]
- [Bug 16302] possible unnecessary insertion of U+0020 SPACE in mime type expression
Friday, 5 October 2012
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- RE: [IndexedDB] Implementation Discrepancies on 'prevunique' and 'nextunique' on index cursor
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
- RE: publish WD of Shadow DOM; deadline Oct 10
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Pointer Lock; deadline Oct 4
- [Bug 19297] New: May user agents apply additional restrictions on entering pointer lock?
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Pointer Lock; deadline Oct 4
- CfC: publish FPWD of Push API; deadline October 12
- Re: [push-api] Moving Push API to FPWD [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: Proposal for "Cascading Attribute Sheets" - like CSS, but for attributes!
- Re: [push-api] Moving Push API to FPWD [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- [Bug 19283] New: Investigate IDNA2003 separators
Thursday, 4 October 2012
- RE: publish WD of Shadow DOM; deadline Oct 10
- Registration for Test the Web Forward Paris is now open!
- Re: [selectors-api] Kudos on find/findAll, feedback on spec readability
- RE: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: [quota-api] API change suggestions
- Re: Moving File API: Directories and System API to Note track?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implementation Discrepancies on 'prevunique' and 'nextunique' on index cursor
Wednesday, 3 October 2012
- CfC: publish WD of Shadow DOM; deadline Oct 10
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implementation Discrepancies on 'prevunique' and 'nextunique' on index cursor
- Re: [WebIDL] Interface object prototype and function object
- Re: [WebIDL] Interface object prototype and function object
- [WebIDL] Interface object prototype and function object
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implementation Discrepancies on 'prevunique' and 'nextunique' on index cursor
- Re: [IndexedDB] Implementation Discrepancies on 'prevunique' and 'nextunique' on index cursor
- [IndexedDB] Implementation Discrepancies on 'prevunique' and 'nextunique' on index cursor
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- Re: [pointerlock] Is Pointer Lock feature complete i.e. LC ready? [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]
- [Bug 17264] Add attributes to use ping/pong frames effectively
- RE: [XHR] chunked
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error
Monday, 1 October 2012
- Re: [IndexedDB] blocked event could be an error
- Re: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?
- RE: In WebIDL, should having a .prototype on interface objects be optional?
- Re: [admin] Call for Editor for XHR REC track doc
- Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15