- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:59:57 -0700
- To: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+e610yWZ_2CnqSWu7tyjj_Xb2vOk3_TumsFjrgvrZaqkA@mail.gmail.com>
Cox will file an FO (as a W3C member) if it is not fixed. On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com> wrote: > I object to making such a change. > > > On 11/16/2012 02:32 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > >> Before going to CR, I believe the [HTML] entry in the references section >> needs to be changed to reference an appropriate W3C specification. A >> present, it reference a non-W3C document. >> >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com >> >wrote: >> >> On 11/15/12 5:31 PM, ext Hill, Brad wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I have placed a draft for review at: >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/****webappsec/cors-draft/<http://www.w3.org/2011/**webappsec/cors-draft/> >>>> <http://**www.w3.org/2011/webappsec/**cors-draft/<http://www.w3.org/2011/webappsec/cors-draft/> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> And this is a Call for Consensus among the WebAppSec and WebApps WGs to >>>> take this particular text (with necessary additions to the Status of >>>> this >>>> Document section if approved) forward to Candidate Recommendation. >>>> >>>> >>>> I support this CfC although I am wondering about the CR exit criteria. >>> >>> Do you expect to re-use the CSP1.0 criteria: >>> >>> [[ >>> The entrance criteria for this document to enter the Proposed >>> Recommendation stage is to have a minimum of two independent and >>> interoperable user agents that implementation all the features of this >>> specification, which will be determined by passing the user agent tests >>> defined in the test suite developed by the Working Group. >>> ]] >>> >>> My preference is what WebApps has used in other CRs because I think it is >>> clearer that a single implementation is not required to pass every test >>> but >>> that at least two implementations must pass every test. F.ex.: >>> >>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-****websockets-20120920/#crec<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-**websockets-20120920/#crec> >>> <ht**tp://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-**websockets-20120920/#crec<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-websockets-20120920/#crec> >>> > >>> >>>> >>>> >>> -Thanks, AB >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 14:00:45 UTC