- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 06:57:38 -0500
- To: ext Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
On 11/6/12 3:23 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote: > On 11/06/2012 08:02 AM, Adam Barth wrote: >> Does the WebApps Working Group plan do either of these things? >> >> A) Put in technical effort to improve the specification > > Unlikely. My expectation is that public-webapps will continue to be one venue for comments about the spec. If a credible Editor does not commit to moving the spec along the REC track, then I believe one option is for the WG to publish the spec. That is, don't specifically identify an Editor. Regardless, as I stated previously, proper attribution is needed. >> B) License the fork in such a way as to let me merge improvements >> into my copy > > Definitely not. I am not aware of any changes nor impending changes to the W3C's Document license policy WebApps follows. -AB
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 11:58:08 UTC