- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:02:00 -0500
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
It's been a month since we talked about the next publication steps for the IDB spec (#Mins). Since then, I am not aware of any work on the #LC-comments tracking. As such, here is a straw man proposal to move v1 forward: ... * Forget about processing #LC-comments * Mark all open #Bugsfor v.next * Start a CfC to publish a new LC based on the latest #ED "as is". (If Jonas commitsto making some important changes, that would be fine too but I don't think we want to includeany "feature creep" or API breaks.) Re v.Next, I recall Jonas said he was willing to continue to be an Editor but I am not aware of anED being created. If/when a new ED is created, we can work toward a FPWD. Comments? -Thanks, AB #Mins <http://www.w3.org/2012/10/29-webapps-minutes.html#item16> #Bugs <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=Indexed%20Database%20API&resolution=---&list_id=2509> #ED <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html> #LC-comments <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/IndexedDB%20Disposition%20of%20Comments.html>
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 17:02:29 UTC