- From: Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:52:46 +0900
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
Hi all, I came to start working on Progress Events spec to move it towards REC. Because the spec is already a CR, I am planning to focus on satisfying the exit criteria to ship it. Please see inline comments and questions. Jungkee > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:51 PM > > On 11/15/12 3:11 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote: > > Hi Art, Charles and Anne, > > > > At this stage, it will be of great help if you give me some comments on > any issues, concerns, expected actions, etc. > > Since the spec is already a CR (with exit criteria > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-progress-events-20110922/#crec>), some > questions ... > > * Are there any significant differences between the CR and Anne's WHATWG > spec? If yes, what are they and should they postponed to v.next? As I've gone through it, there's no significant change. There are only a few minor ones including term (octets to bytes) and xref (to event definition) things. > * What is the implementation status of the CR? Are there at least two > independent implementations that can be tested? This is my question at the moment. Can anyone share implementation data for this spec? > * Are the tests in the test suite sufficient to test the CR > <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Ms2ger/>? > If not, what is the plan to fill the gaps? I will scope it out. > BTW, I have a relatively strong preference to have this conversation on > public-webapps so please feel free to copy any part of what I say above > to that list. > > -Thanks, Art
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 02:53:19 UTC