- From: Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:11:25 +0100
- To: João Eiras <joaoe@opera.com>
- Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 19:11:53 UTC
Similarly the vendors deciding not wanting to support WebSQL isn't a spec issue and it should be filed in the bug tracker of your favorite vendor. On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:02 PM, João Eiras <joaoe@opera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:50:20 +0100, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:42 PM, João Eiras <joaoe@opera.com> wrote: >> >> You're again confusing implementation details with the specification. >>> User >>> agents are free to implement whatever quota management they want, as long >>> as it's transparent and respects the visible effects on the webpage side. >>> >>> That may be so, it still means WebSQL is universally hard limited >> without >> escape to 5mb. So it doesn't really matter if that's what's specced or >> not, >> it makes it equally unsuitable for data beyond 5mb. >> > > Again, not a spec issue. Go to your favorite browser bug tracker and make > a feature request. > >
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 19:11:53 UTC