- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:15:04 -0400
- To: "public-webapps@w3c.org" <public-webapps@w3c.org>, Bryan Sullivan <BS3131@att.com>, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA <efc@tid.es>
On 10/5/12 7:38 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: > The Push API Editors would like to publish a First Public Working > Draft of their spec and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using > the following spec as the basis > <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/default/index.html>. > > This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's > decision to request advancement". > > By publishing this FPWD, the group sends a signal to the community to > begin reviewing the document. The FPWD reflects where the group is on > this spec at the time of publication; it does _not_ necessarily mean > there is consensus on the spec's contents. > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to > this e-mail by October 12 at the latest. Positive response is > preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as agreement > with the proposal. Although there were no objections to this CfC, Jonas raised a number of concerns in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0042.html>. Although we will have an opportunity to discuss these comments in Lyon, I would like the spec Editors to add an "Issue Block" in the Security and Privacy concerns section and include a link to Jonas' comment. Bryan, Eduardo - I will contact you off-list about preparing the spec for FPWD. (See <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/SpecEditing> if you are unfamiliar with the W3C's TR publication process.) -Thanks, AB
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 11:15:42 UTC