- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:58:04 -0800
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@google.com>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:04:20 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: >>>> >>>> 1. If DOCUMENT does not have a browsing context, Let TEMPLATE CONTENTS >>>> OWNER be DOCUMENT and abort these steps. >>>> 2. Otherwise, Let TEMPLATE CONTENTS OWNER be a new Document node that >>>> does not have a browsing context. >>> >>> >>> Is there a big win from this inconsistency? Why not always have a >>> separate doc as the template contents owner? >> >> >> Or why not always use the owner document of the <template> element? > > > I think that would cause things like <img> elements to load. True. Though I wonder if that can be solved in other ways. Should be relatively easy to fix in Gecko, though I don't know about other implementations of course. Seems unfortunate to add the wonkyness of separate owner documents just to overcome this hurdle. / Jonas
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 22:59:07 UTC