Comments on the Prov Primer
Re: PROV-ISSUE-458: wasInfluencedBy is not irreflexive [prov-dm-constraints]
reminder: prov-o telecon today
prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-07-26
1st draft of implementation questionnaire form
PROV-ISSUE-463 (freimuth): comments from robert freimuth [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-462 (entity-definition-precision): Definition o entity may be too liberal [prov-dm]
DC-Mapping Note document update
list of implementations
Updates from PROV-XML Group
RE: [closed] publication request for: prov-dm, prov-o, prov-n, prov-primer
Last Call published!
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 26 July 2012
prov-o meeting: full agenda
PROV-ISSUE-461: provo cross reference inadequate in printed form [PROV-O HTML]
PROV-ISSUE-460: prov-o egs should be <=97 characters [PROV-O HTML]
prov-wg Telcon Minutes July 19, 2012
PROV-ISSUE-459 (prov-constraints-lc-review): PROV-CONSTRAINTS review [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-459 (prov-constraints-lc-review): PROV-CONSTRAINTS review [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-459 (prov-constraints-lc-review): PROV-CONSTRAINTS review [prov-dm-constraints]
PROV-ISSUE-458: wasInfluencedBy is not irreflexive [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-458: wasInfluencedBy is not irreflexive [prov-dm-constraints]
PROV-ISSUE-457: qualifiedInfluence domain does not match domain of wasInfluencedBy [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-457: qualifiedInfluence domain does not match domain of wasInfluencedBy [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-457: qualifiedInfluence domain does not match domain of wasInfluencedBy [Ontology]
- Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-457: qualifiedInfluence domain does not match domain of wasInfluencedBy [Ontology]
- Re: [owl changed] PROV-ISSUE-457: qualifiedInfluence domain does not match domain of wasInfluencedBy [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-457: qualifiedInfluence domain does not match domain of wasInfluencedBy [Ontology]
PROV-ISSUE-456: Simplify union domain of hadRole using InstantaneousEvent [Ontology]
[PROV-O] Checking examples
Regrets for next three meetings
Re: PROV-ISSUE-411 (tracedto-inference): Should tracedTo allow tracing across specialization relation [prov-dm-constraints]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-394: is alternateOf symmetric? [prov-dm-constraints]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-387 (unique-generation): generation [prov-dm-constraints]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-343 (account-objections): Objections regarding Account [prov-dm-constraints]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-333 (review-prov-dm-constraints-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm-constraints wd5 [prov-dm-constraints]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-364 (collection-constraints-bugs): Collection constraint has wrong syntax for memberOf [prov-dm-constraints]
prov-o meeting next week
PROV-ISSUE-455 (Dong): Type mismatch between PROV-O and PROV-DM [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-455 (Dong): Type mismatch between PROV-O and PROV-DM [Ontology]
PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-454 (key across relations/objectss): can the same identifier be used for different relations objects [prov-dm-constraints]
PROV-ISSUE-453 (influence identifiers): influence inference and uniqueness
PROV-ISSUE-452: what is plan in association inference [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-452: what is plan in association inference [prov-dm-constraints]
PROV-ISSUE-451 (revision-is-alternate): Keep or drop revision-is-alternate [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-451 (revision-is-alternate): Keep or drop revision-is-alternate [prov-dm-constraints]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-451 (revision-is-alternate): Keep or drop revision-is-alternate [prov-dm-constraints]
Re: [owl changed] ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology
Your feedback on pre-LC prov-o
inverse counts
"PROV-DM term" link in prov-o
prov-wg: Telcon agenda July 19, 2012
- Re: prov-wg: Telcon agenda July 19, 2012
- Re: prov-wg: Telcon agenda July 19, 2012
- Re: prov-wg: Telcon agenda July 19, 2012
reminder: prov-o telecon today
dublin core mapping as note?
tracker now watching public-prov-comments
Re: [PROV-N] Specific recommendation for charset parameter in PROV-N media type
Appendix A PROV-DM
Minutes Telcon July 5, 2012
scribe is missing for today's call, please contact me
[PROV-N] Specific recommendation for charset parameter in PROV-N media type
PROV-ISSUE-450: DM tables "incomplete" (specifically: activity ending activity) [prov-dm]
prov-o feedback points yet to handle
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 12 July 2012
Re: Relationship between PROV-O and PROV-DM (was: Are qualified<Foo> relations IFPs?)
- RE: Relationship between PROV-O and PROV-DM (was: Are qualified<Foo> relations IFPs?)
- Re: Relationship between PROV-O and PROV-DM
[PROV-N] RFC 6657 on Update to MIME regarding "charset" Parameter Handling in Textual Media Types
provo qualification tables: hover text for column headers
prov namespace management proposals
- Re: prov namespace management proposals
- Re: prov namespace management proposals
- Re: prov namespace management proposals
- Re: prov namespace management proposals
- Re: prov namespace management proposals
PROV-N media type registration charset redux
PROV-ISSUE-437 (prov-dm-post-f2f3-review): Final review before last call vote [prov-dm]
PROV-ISSUE-449: Better definition of prov:value [prov-dm]
Pre-last-call review of PROV-O
reminder: prov-o telecon today
PROV-ISSUE-448 (Security-considerations): Provide proper discussion of security considerations [cross-document]
NEW issue - cross document
Pre-last-call review of PROV-N
Fwd: relations between activites
Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
Last call and primer
Re: PROV-ISSUE-408 (prov-n-review-for-LC): feedback on PROV-N document (for last call release) [prov-n]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-382 (jzhao): Qualification patters in prov-o section 3.3 [PROV-O HTML]
tracking public comments
prov-o team: all assigned
PROV-ISSUE-447: subactivity relation [prov-dm]
Fwd: prov:involvee
PROV-ISSUE-446: prov:involvee not documented in PROV-O [PROV-O HTML]
handling public comments
PROV-ISSUE-445 (wasGeneratedAtTime): Erroneous wasGeneratedAtTime [PROV-O HTML]
RE: PROV-ISSUE-430: Primer should link to PAQ [Primer]
Re: relations between activites
Re: PROV-ISSUE-438 (prov-n-post-f2f3-review ): Final review before last call vote [prov-n]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-438 (prov-n-post-f2f3-review ): Final review before last call vote [prov-n]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-438 (prov-n-post-f2f3-review ): Final review before last call vote [prov-n]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-438 (prov-n-post-f2f3-review ): Final review before last call vote [prov-n]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-438 (prov-n-post-f2f3-review ): Final review before last call vote [prov-n]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-438 (prov-n-post-f2f3-review ): Final review before last call vote [prov-n]
Fwd: Auto: public-prov-comments@w3.org autoreply
text/provenance-notation media type request
Re: PROV-ISSUE-438 (prov-n-post-f2f3-review ): Final review before last call vote [prov-n]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-437 (prov-dm-post-f2f3-review): Final review before last call vote [prov-dm]
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 05 July 2012
Re: PROV-ISSUE-403 (Feedback_TL): Feedback on the mapping from Tim Lebo [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-404 (Feedback_SS): Feedback on the mapping from Satya Sahoo [Mapping PROV-O to Dublin Core]
Re: prov-wg: Important Last Call Reviewers + Vote + Minutes of June 28, 2012 Telcon
F2F3 Meeting Minutes
PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- Re: Membership should be unqualified (Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML])
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]
- Are qualified<Foo> relations IFPs? (was: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call))
- Re: Are qualified<Foo> relations IFPs? (was: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call))
- Re: Are qualified<Foo> relations IFPs?
- Re: Are qualified<Foo> relations IFPs?
- Relationship between PROV-O and PROV-DM (was: Are qualified<Foo> relations IFPs?)
- Re: Relationship between PROV-O and PROV-DM (was: Are qualified<Foo> relations IFPs?)
- Re: Relationship between PROV-O and PROV-DM
- Re: Relationship between PROV-O and PROV-DM
- Re: Relationship between PROV-O and PROV-DM
- Re: Relationship between PROV-O and PROV-DM
- Re: Relationship between PROV-O and PROV-DM
- Re: Are qualified<Foo> relations IFPs?
- Re: Are qualified<Foo> relations IFPs? (was: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call))
Re: PROV-ISSUE-377 (rl-plus-plus-justify): All RL "violations" justified appendix [PROV-O HTML]
PROV-ISSUE-443 (prov-n-extensibility): prov-n-extensibilty [prov-n]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-437 (prov-dm-post-f2f3-review): Final review before last call vote [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-437 (prov-dm-post-f2f3-review): Final review before last call vote [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-437 (prov-dm-post-f2f3-review): Final review before last call vote [prov-dm]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-437 (prov-dm-post-f2f3-review): Final review before last call vote [prov-dm]
[Prov-O] Review of examples
- Re: [Prov-O] Review of examples
- Re: [Prov-O] Review of examples
- Re: [Prov-O] Review of examples
- Re: [Prov-O] Review of examples
Re: PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-355 (convenient-notation-for-qualified-names): introduce a convenience notation for qualified names [prov-n]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-439: Reference to dateTime in prov-n [prov-n]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-442 (prov-o-html-term-coverage): Identify prov.owl terms that can be omitted in prov.html [PROV-O HTML]
Re: PROV-ISSUE-410 (prov-primer-review): Feedback on Primer document [Primer]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-410 (prov-primer-review): Feedback on Primer document [Primer]
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-410 (prov-primer-review): Feedback on Primer document [Primer]