- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:09:24 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
... As some noted I shouldn't apologise for getting the document ready ... for the delay in doing so! Luc On 23/07/12 15:04, Luc Moreau wrote: > Dear all, > > Apologies in getting the prov-constraints document ready. > It is now available for review at > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/releases/ED-prov-constraints-20120723/prov-constraints.html > > > It would be great if we can still follow the timetable we agreed on > the call last week. > > Regards, > The prov-c-team > > On 20/07/12 12:02, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-459 (prov-constraints-lc-review): PROV-CONSTRAINTS review >> [prov-dm-constraints] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/459 >> >> Raised by: James Cheney >> On product: prov-dm-constraints >> >> Hi, >> >> This issue is to capture review comments for the next draft of >> PROV-CONSTRAINTS, which will be released soon. >> >> Please answer the following review questions: >> >> 1. Is PROV-CONSTRAINTS ready to be released as a last call working >> draft (modulo editorial issues and resolution to the below issues)? >> >> 2. Regarding ISSUE-346: Is the role, meaning, and intended use of >> each type of inference or constraint clear? >> (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/346) >> >> 3. Regarding ISSUE-451: Are there any objections to the >> revision-is-alternate inference? >> (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/451) >> >> 4. Regarding ISSUE-454: Are the rules for disjointness clear and >> appropriate? (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/454) >> >> 5. Regarding ISSUE-458: Should influence (and therefore all >> subrelations, including communication) be irreflexive, or can it be >> reflexive (i.e., can wasInfluencedBy(x,x) be valid)? >> (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/458) >> >> 5. Are there any objections to closing other open issues on >> PROV-CONSTRAINTS? They are: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/387 >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/394 >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/452 >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/453 >> >> 6. Are there any new issues concerning definitions, constraints, or >> inferences? If so, please raise as new issues to be addressed before >> LC vote, ideally with a suggested change that would address the issue. >> >> >> --James >> >> >>
Received on Monday, 23 July 2012 14:10:21 UTC