- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:02:36 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-459 (prov-constraints-lc-review): PROV-CONSTRAINTS review [prov-dm-constraints] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/459 Raised by: James Cheney On product: prov-dm-constraints Hi, This issue is to capture review comments for the next draft of PROV-CONSTRAINTS, which will be released soon. Please answer the following review questions: 1. Is PROV-CONSTRAINTS ready to be released as a last call working draft (modulo editorial issues and resolution to the below issues)? 2. Regarding ISSUE-346: Is the role, meaning, and intended use of each type of inference or constraint clear? (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/346) 3. Regarding ISSUE-451: Are there any objections to the revision-is-alternate inference? (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/451) 4. Regarding ISSUE-454: Are the rules for disjointness clear and appropriate? (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/454) 5. Regarding ISSUE-458: Should influence (and therefore all subrelations, including communication) be irreflexive, or can it be reflexive (i.e., can wasInfluencedBy(x,x) be valid)? (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/458) 5. Are there any objections to closing other open issues on PROV-CONSTRAINTS? They are: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/387 http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/394 http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/452 http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/453 6. Are there any new issues concerning definitions, constraints, or inferences? If so, please raise as new issues to be addressed before LC vote, ideally with a suggested change that would address the issue. --James
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 11:02:41 UTC