W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > July 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-438 (prov-n-post-f2f3-review ): Final review before last call vote [prov-n]

From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 19:10:29 +0100
Message-Id: <6C9F13D2-8EC1-4DA8-8762-2EE8124A542A@inf.ed.ac.uk>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
> Question for reviewers: Can the document be published as Last Call working draft?

Yes, modulo comments below.

0.  As with prov-dm, I'm unsure whether additional authors need to be listed.  I contributed to the discussion of how to avoid ambiguity (identifiers and optional arguments), perhaps others currently listed as authors of prov-dm also contributed and should be acknowledged.  I didn't actually write anything so wouldn't fight to be added, but I also contributed to PROV-O without directly writing the text.

1. S1.2.  "This document *is* structured as follows"

2. Example 2: The sentence in the example has no verb.

3.  Example 8: It looks strange to me that the three statements all use ex:a10 instead of different ids.  (Also, why a10? Maybe this used to be example 10)

4. S2.5: "cooments" sp.

5. S3.3.4: "wasAssociatiedWith" sp.

6.  S3.3.5: Replace the keyword "influence" with "wasInfluencedBy" everywhere.

7. Example 25, first statement, the first comma should be semicolon

8.  Many relations (wasStartedBy, etc.) have a "Note" saying that at least one of the optional parameters must be present.  Please summarize these rules somewhere since it seems (to me) easy to miss one.  Alternatively, they could be expressed by adding grammar rules (I think this was suggested and discarded before, it's probably not very maintainable.)

9.  S3.4.1.  There are no examples exercising the option to declare namespaces in this section.  Please add one, or link to the later section on namespace declarations that does have these examples.

10.  S3.6.  Cf. my suggestion for PROV-DM to just have a single binary relation memberOf(element, collection), without the id, attributes or completeness flag.  This section would also have to change if this suggestion is adopted.

11.  In productions 59-63, it seems that some nonterminals are references to SPARQL nonterminals, while others have the same name as SPARQL nonterminals but have been redefined.  Is it possible to include all of these to make the PROV-N grammar self-contained? (It also might help to give new names to the SPARQL nonterminals that are being redefined.)

12.  The hyperlink on PN_PREFIX goes to the wrong place in SPARQL.

13.  It seems that a string consisting of a single '-' can be parsed as PN_CHARS_OTHERS and hens also as a PN_LOCAL.  This makes rules 38-42 ambiguous.  On the other hand, lots of URIs use '-'.  Suggested fix: Allow '-' only if it is not the first or last character (could be handled similar to '.').

14.  S4.  Suggest pointing out that bundles cannot be nested (because bundles aren't expressions)

15.  ProvRDF and ProvXML wiki page citations:  I don't see why we need these, and if we do, I don't think the authorship is correct - I am definitely not the only contributor to ProvRDF, and unlikely to do any more work on ProvXML (which should eventually be a note).

16.  PROV-SEM will eventually become a note if published, but I'm not sure we need to explicitly reference it here as a wiki page.  I guess this can change later as appropriate.

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 18:10:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:18 UTC