- From: Tim Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:00:02 -0400
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Sent from my iPad On Jul 10, 2012, at 19:11, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > No, there's no separate OWL file for PROV-AQ. There is now. :) -Tim > > #g > -- > > > On 10/07/2012 21:27, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> Sounds good. >> >> Do you have a paq.owl somewhere, or should I put my slice into http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/paq ? >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> On Jul 10, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >> >>> Hi Tim, >>> >>> I think it is. There seems to be a number of decent options. >>> >>> So go for it. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Paul >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Timothy Lebo<lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >>>> Paul, >>>> >>>> Given these proposals, is it safe to slice out PAQ from PROV-O. >>>> I can move the terms into a paq.owl and save it away for later use by the Note. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> On Jul 10, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Graham Klyne wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've added a brief summary - mainly a placeholder. >>>>> >>>>> #g >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> On 10/07/2012 17:41, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Graham Klyne<graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm still not understanding the problem that arises if all terms from all >>>>>>> documents are included in one OWL file, where the PROV-AQ terms (and >>>>>>> others?) are simply described with an rdfs:label and rdfs:comment value, and >>>>>>> nothing more. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you write this as another solution? It would certainly be less >>>>>> messy, as those additional terms would not generally show up as >>>>>> anything in ontology tools (if anything they would be 'individuals'). >>>>>> >>>>>> It would not be sufficient for Dictionary which needs to be done as an >>>>>> PROV-O extension, but there could be a third property owl:isDefinedBy >>>>>> (?) to a separate dictionary.owl. >>>>>> >>>>>> It would be like a variant of 2.1. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) >>> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ >>> Assistant Professor >>> Knowledge Representation& Reasoning Group >>> Artificial Intelligence Section >>> Department of Computer Science >>> VU University Amsterdam >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2012 01:00:44 UTC