W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > July 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-459 (prov-constraints-lc-review): PROV-CONSTRAINTS review [prov-dm-constraints]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:04:02 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|4d012db70883cd755afb770b1b761ac3o6MF4V08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|500D59D2.805@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Dear all,

Apologies in getting the prov-constraints document ready.
It is now available for review at

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/releases/ED-prov-constraints-20120723/prov-constraints.html

It would be great if we can still follow the timetable we agreed on the 
call last week.

Regards,
The prov-c-team

On 20/07/12 12:02, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-459 (prov-constraints-lc-review): PROV-CONSTRAINTS review [prov-dm-constraints]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/459
>
> Raised by: James Cheney
> On product: prov-dm-constraints
>
> Hi,
>
> This issue is to capture review comments for the next draft of PROV-CONSTRAINTS, which will be released soon.
>
> Please answer the following review questions:
>
> 1.  Is PROV-CONSTRAINTS ready to be released as a last call working draft (modulo editorial issues and resolution to the below issues)?
>
> 2.  Regarding ISSUE-346: Is the role, meaning, and intended use of each type of inference or constraint clear?  (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/346)
>
> 3.  Regarding ISSUE-451: Are there any objections to the revision-is-alternate inference? (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/451)
>
> 4.  Regarding ISSUE-454: Are the rules for disjointness clear and appropriate? (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/454)
>
> 5.  Regarding ISSUE-458: Should influence (and therefore all subrelations, including communication) be irreflexive, or can it be reflexive (i.e., can wasInfluencedBy(x,x) be valid)?  (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/458)
>
> 5.  Are there any objections to closing other open issues on PROV-CONSTRAINTS?  They are:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/387
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/394
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/452
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/453
>
> 6.  Are there any new issues concerning definitions, constraints, or inferences? If so, please raise as new issues to be addressed before LC vote, ideally with a suggested change that would address the issue.
>
>
> --James
>
>
>
>    
Received on Monday, 23 July 2012 14:05:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:18 UTC