- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:05:00 +0100
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Paul, I'm still not understanding the problem that arises if all terms from all documents are included in one OWL file, where the PROV-AQ terms (and others?) are simply described with an rdfs:label and rdfs:comment value, and nothing more. #g -- On 10/07/2012 11:09, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi All, > > I put together a page around namespace management with the two > proposed approaches to resolving ISSUE-440. > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvNamespaceManagement > > Please feel free to comment and add anything you think I'm missing. > > Thanks > Paul > > >
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2012 15:15:58 UTC