- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:25:01 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
You're right: it was generated (not used) and invalidated. My mistake. Sorry. #g -- On 17/07/2012 18:00, Timothy Lebo wrote: > :: sigh :: > > I think we both got it wrong, how about: > > generated > and > invalidated > ? > > If you disagree, please let me know so that we can hunt down why you were misled. > > Thanks! > Tim > > > On Jul 17, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > >> Graham, in your prov-o review [1] you said: >> >> >> B. Names of inverse properties >> >> Para 1: I count *two* exceptions, not just one (used and invalidated) >> >> >> >> My count is generated and wasGeneratedBy, not used and invalidated. How did you come up with your list? >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Review_of_prov-o_july_3_2012_for_last_call#Graham >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 10:36:33 UTC