- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:55:15 -0400
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Thanks, Paul. What about discussing the issue with the raiser (between acknowledge and respond)? That goes to public-prov-comment@w3.org, too? I added my issue to that page. -Tim On Jul 6, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi Tim, > > We should raise an issue for every comment and cc > public-prov-comment@w3.org (wg members get this as well) > > Issues should be raised on the respective product and also listed on > the following wiki page > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Tracking_Public_Comments > > On that wiki page I'm also quickly written up a procedure, we can > amend that as we go forward. > > Thanks > Paul > > > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >> What is the process to respond to public comments? >> >> Is it something drastically different from how we handle comments from the group? >> I have the sense that it is more formal. >> >> I'm getting ready to respond to Renato Iannella about the "prov:involvee" property in the HTML. >> Do I cc public-prov-comments@w3.org or public-prov-wg@w3.org? >> >> Do we raise an issue for every comment, so it's into the system? >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> > > > > -- > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group > Artificial Intelligence Section > Department of Computer Science > VU University Amsterdam >
Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 19:00:21 UTC