- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:15:09 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Sam Coppens Ugent <sam.coppens@ugent.be>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 10/07/2012 21:43, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> Sam (and WG),
>
> I am getting conflicting suggestions for the ordering in section 3.3.
>
> At least someone has suggested one of {table, example, diagram} to go first, so we can't please everyone.
>
> I'm not sure how to resolve this.
>
> The current order of https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/Overview.html#description-qualified-terms is:
>
> * intro with one abstract pattern
My proposal was for a diagram >here< of *one* example to match the description
in the first paragraph, to provide exposition of the text which is quite hard to
follow on its own. The full set of diagrams should still come later.
#g
> * tables of all abstract patterns
> * transition that ties tables to illustrations to cross reference (with two abstract examples)
> * two concrete examples
> * two abstract examples
> * diagram of all abstract patterns.
> * four concrete examples
>
> Any discussion welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Sam Coppens Ugent wrote:
>
>> Section 3.3: Qualified Terms
>>
>> I would consider putting the example before the two tables listing the properties that can be qualified. This makes the section easier to read and to understand, otherwise you get the tables right away and get lost in them.
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2012 23:26:11 UTC