- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 16:20:54 +0200
- To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
It already does this. That's not the question. The question is how do we appropriately integrate terms defined by different notes that we define as a working group. Paul On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote: > If you ask for text/turtle, it should 303 redirect to prov-o in turtle. > > Jim > > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker > <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> >> PROV-ISSUE-440 (namespace-dereference-owl): How do we enable (owl) >> dereferenceability from Notes? [cross-document] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/440 >> >> Raised by: Paul Groth >> On product: cross-document >> >> Both the paq and dictionary (as well as other notes) define new terms as >> part of the prov namespaces. These terms are often defined using owl. We >> would like these terms to be correctly served up using content negotiation. >> >> e.g. if I do >> curl -H "Accept: text/turtle" -L >> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#ProvenanceService >> >> I would expect to get back the owl definition of this term >> >> However, currently this is provided by the prov-o owl ontology. How do we >> merge these terms without modifying the owl ontology file or do we modify >> it? >> >> >> > > > > -- > Jim McCusker > Programmer Analyst > Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics > Yale School of Medicine > james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 > http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu > > PhD Student > Tetherless World Constellation > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > mccusj@cs.rpi.edu > http://tw.rpi.edu -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Monday, 2 July 2012 14:21:22 UTC