Re: inverse counts

:: sigh ::

I think we both got it wrong, how about:

generated
and
invalidated
?

If you disagree, please let me know so that we can hunt down why you were misled.

Thanks!
Tim


On Jul 17, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:

> Graham, in your prov-o review [1] you said:
> 
> 
> B. Names of inverse properties
> 
> Para 1: I count *two* exceptions, not just one (used and invalidated)
> 
> 
> 
> My count is generated and wasGeneratedBy, not used and invalidated. How did you come up with your list?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Review_of_prov-o_july_3_2012_for_last_call#Graham
> 

Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 17:00:46 UTC