- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:25:35 -0400
- To: "Miles, Simon" <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:15 PM, Miles, Simon wrote: > Sure, if you know you're going to fix it :) It is fixed at http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o It will flow to https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/Overview.html in time. -Tim > > Dr Simon Miles > Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics > Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK > +44 (0)20 7848 1166 > > Transparent Provenance Derivation for User Decisions: > http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1400/ > ________________________________________ > From: Timothy Lebo [lebot@rpi.edu] > Sent: 06 July 2012 18:10 > To: Miles, Simon > Cc: Provenance Working Group > Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-445 (wasGeneratedAtTime): Erroneous wasGeneratedAtTime [PROV-O HTML] > > I forgot to mention that this issue is closed pending review. > > May it be closed, Simon? > > Thanks, > Tim > > On Jul 6, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > >> Simon, >> >> Thanks for catching this. >> The prov-o team will be validating all examples against the ontology as we work towards the final recommendation, so we'll find any other inconsistencies, too. >> >> I'm wondering if "was" should be included in the datatype property names, for consistency. >> Their occurrence in the examples seems to suggest that it is the more natural naming. >> >> -Tim >> >> >> On Jul 6, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >>> PROV-ISSUE-445 (wasGeneratedAtTime): Erroneous wasGeneratedAtTime [PROV-O HTML] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/445 >>> >>> Raised by: Simon Miles >>> On product: PROV-O HTML >>> >>> Some examples in the current PROV-O document contain >>> prov:wasGeneratedAtTime >>> when it should be >>> prov:generatedAtTime >>> >>> There are 4 instances. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Simon >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 17:26:04 UTC