W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > July 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-355 (convenient-notation-for-qualified-names): introduce a convenience notation for qualified names [prov-n]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:48:20 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|7aeeefe520eb9dbce46235a01f1fb56eo62And08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FF2BFE4.4020605@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi all,

This issue was implemented a long time ago, with notation 
'prov:SoftwareAgent' as
outlined here.

Closing this issue.

Regards,
Luc

On 19/04/12 15:23, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-355 (convenient-notation-for-qualified-names): introduce a convenience notation for qualified names [prov-n]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/355
>
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: prov-n
>
>
> PROV-N has a production for typed literals [1].
>
> "1234" %% xsd:Integer
> "abc" %% xsd:String
>
> It allows for convenience notation (with stringLiteral and intLiteral)
>
> 123
> "abc"
>
>
> Qualified names need to be written as follows:
>
> "ex:Foo" %% xsd:QName
>
> Which is not very pleasant to read.
>
>
> It is proposed to introduce a convenience notation for qualified names.
> The proposal is to use another form of singe quotes for this:
>
> 'ex:Foo'
>
> would convenience notation for
>
> "ex:Foo" %% xsd:QName
>
>
>
> PS. At the same time, we should allow for more relaxed local names (not necessarily XML QNames).  We should allow prov:qualifiedName in the list of permitted dataytypes in literals.
>
>
>
> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-n.html#expression-literal
>
>
>
>    
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 09:50:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:18 UTC