- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:44:44 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-442 (prov-o-html-term-coverage): Identify prov.owl terms that can be omitted in prov.html [PROV-O HTML] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/442 Raised by: Timothy Lebo On product: PROV-O HTML The prov-o team is currently reviewing the prov.html for the discussion's coverage of the prov.owl terms. For the sake of brevity, it may be reasonable that some terms in prov.owl be omitted, since they can be self-explanatory or are ancillary. If the term is not discussed explicitly in narrative, it already exists in the cross reference, has an example there, and had commenting in the OWL file itself. So, omitting a term from narrative is not ignoring its existence. This ISSUE is to identify which terms the WG is willing to omit from HTML discussion for these reasons. For starters, is it reasonable to omit ActivityInfluence, AgentInfluence, and EntityInfluence from the narrative? Thanks, Tim
Received on Monday, 2 July 2012 19:44:45 UTC