- From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:51:55 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <E793B56D-5485-485B-BF06-B1DDFC8AE7A0@inf.ed.ac.uk>
('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
I have attempted to address this issue in the review version of PROV-CONSTRAINTS that will be made available tomorrow. I am marking it as "pending review", and one of the review questions for PROV-CONSTRAINTS will concern whether this issue has been addressed. --James On May 21, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > James, > > On May 21, 2012, at 11:02 AM, James Cheney wrote: > >> I believe this issue has been addressed, modulo some points raised in Tim's recent review [1]. >> >> Tim, will addressing the related points in your review suffice to close the issue? > > The latest draft is closer to making the distinction better, but I still became confused. > I would like to keep this open until you've tried to respond to my recent comments. > > Please let me know when you would like me to review, or if you have any questions. > > Regards, > Tim > > >> >> --James >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Dm-constraints_review_2012_May_17_by_Lebo >> >> On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >>> PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/346 >>> >>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>> On product: prov-dm-constraints >>> >>> by 3.1.3 Generation >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/releases/ED-prov-dm-20120402/prov-dm-constraints.html#term-Generation >>> >>> >>> I was already dealing with (and postponing) "interpretations". The document did not explain to me how or when I should read/use them. >>> >>> Now I'm given an in-place constraint and a structural constraint (for generation). >>> >>> The only time these were distinguished was in Section 1, which gave a somewhat reasonable summary AS LONG AS the distinction (and how to use them) is explained further down. By this section 3.1.3, it hasn't become clear and I'm now confused. >>> >>> Recommend adding a discussion about the distinction among these in Section 1 - as well as at the beginning of section 3 in some meta-discourse. >>> >>> >>> This is a BLOCKER for public release of draft, because it leads to too much confusion. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in >> Scotland, with registration number SC005336. >
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 17:52:22 UTC