Re: PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints]

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
I have attempted to address this issue in the review version of PROV-CONSTRAINTS that will be made available tomorrow.  I am marking it as "pending review", and one of the review questions for PROV-CONSTRAINTS will concern whether this issue has been addressed.

--James

On May 21, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:

> James,
> 
> On May 21, 2012, at 11:02 AM, James Cheney wrote:
> 
>> I believe this issue has been addressed, modulo some points raised in Tim's recent review [1].
>> 
>> Tim, will addressing the related points in your review suffice to close the issue?
> 
> The latest draft is closer to making the distinction better, but I still became confused.
> I would like to keep this open until you've tried to respond to my recent comments.
> 
> Please let me know when you would like me to review, or if you have any questions.
> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> 
>> 
>> --James
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Dm-constraints_review_2012_May_17_by_Lebo
>> 
>> On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> 
>>> PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints]
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/346
>>> 
>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>>> On product: prov-dm-constraints
>>> 
>>> by 3.1.3 Generation
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/releases/ED-prov-dm-20120402/prov-dm-constraints.html#term-Generation
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I was already dealing with (and postponing) "interpretations". The document did not explain to me how or when I should read/use them.
>>> 
>>> Now I'm given an in-place constraint and a structural constraint (for generation).
>>> 
>>> The only time these were distinguished was in Section 1, which gave a somewhat reasonable summary AS LONG AS the distinction (and how to use them) is explained further down. By this section 3.1.3, it hasn't become clear and I'm now confused.
>>> 
>>> Recommend adding a discussion about the distinction among these in Section 1 - as well as at the beginning of section 3 in some meta-discourse.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This is a BLOCKER for public release of draft, because it leads to too much confusion.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
>> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
> 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 17:52:22 UTC