- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 12:50:01 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Simon, Thanks for catching this. The prov-o team will be validating all examples against the ontology as we work towards the final recommendation, so we'll find any other inconsistencies, too. I'm wondering if "was" should be included in the datatype property names, for consistency. Their occurrence in the examples seems to suggest that it is the more natural naming. -Tim On Jul 6, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-445 (wasGeneratedAtTime): Erroneous wasGeneratedAtTime [PROV-O HTML] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/445 > > Raised by: Simon Miles > On product: PROV-O HTML > > Some examples in the current PROV-O document contain > prov:wasGeneratedAtTime > when it should be > prov:generatedAtTime > > There are 4 instances. > > Thanks, > Simon > > > >
Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 16:50:28 UTC