- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:44:17 -0400
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Jul 18, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > You're right: it was generated (not used) and invalidated. My mistake. Sorry. No problem. Thanks for clarifying. I wanted to make sure the document didn't lead you to that. Regards, Tim > > #g > -- > > On 17/07/2012 18:00, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> :: sigh :: >> >> I think we both got it wrong, how about: >> >> generated >> and >> invalidated >> ? >> >> If you disagree, please let me know so that we can hunt down why you were misled. >> >> Thanks! >> Tim >> >> >> On Jul 17, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> >>> Graham, in your prov-o review [1] you said: >>> >>> >>> B. Names of inverse properties >>> >>> Para 1: I count *two* exceptions, not just one (used and invalidated) >>> >>> >>> >>> My count is generated and wasGeneratedBy, not used and invalidated. How did you come up with your list? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Review_of_prov-o_july_3_2012_for_last_call#Graham >>> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 12:44:47 UTC