Re: PROV-ISSUE-437 (prov-dm-post-f2f3-review): Final review before last call vote [prov-dm] from Jun Zhao on 2012-07-05 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from July 2012)

From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:47:24 +0100
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4FF57ECC.90006@zoo.ox.ac.uk>

Hi Tim,

>> As W3C is the publisher of the document, it's not unreasonable to use attribution for this.
>> (The example already indicates the document is attributed to editors/authros).
>
>
> I think that attributing W3C and the editors/authors is acceptable.
> The distinction that I think is leading to your concern can be made with:
>
> :luc_the_editor prov:actedOnBehalfOf :w3c .
> :paolo_the_editor prov:actedOnBehalfOf :w3c .

Ok. Works for me. I am not fussy.

Cheers,

-- Jun

Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 11:47:48 UTC