- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:39:51 -0400
- To: Sam Coppens Ugent <sam.coppens@ugent.be>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2012 20:40:20 UTC
Sam (and WG), On Jul 9, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Sam Coppens Ugent wrote: > Furthermore, I suggest to keep the cross references with the PROV-DM, PROV-N and PROV-CONSTRAINTS documents. The current decision is to reference ONLY PROV-DM and NOT prov-n or constraints. For prov-n, it is another serialization and ancillary. For constraints, they are not as mature, and PROV-O is not reflecting those constraints per the F2F resolution. If any you have objections to this, please raise them. I'm marking your comment as PENDING-REVIEW at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Review_of_prov-o_july_3_2012_for_last_call#Sam Thanks, Tim
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2012 20:40:20 UTC