Re: PROV-ISSUE-444 (prov-o-to-last-call): Review PROV-O for last call [PROV-O HTML]

Thanks, Sam!

You're on the pile at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Review_of_prov-o_july_3_2012_for_last_call#Sam

Regards,
Tim

On Jul 9, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Sam Coppens Ugent wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> First of all, thumbs up for the prov-o team. This is a very good document. I consider this ready for release as of PROV-O as Last Call.
> I only have some minor comments listed below. The document reads well, is clearly structured and the examples and scenario are clear. Furthermore, I suggest to keep the cross references with the PROV-DM, PROV-N and PROV-CONSTRAINTS documents.
> 
> Minor comments on PROV-O:
> 
> Section 1: Introduction
> 
> Second paragraph,first and last sentence are the same. "PROV-O conforms to the OWL-RL profile and is lightweight so that ..."
> 
> Section 3.1: Starting Point Terms and Section 3.2: Expanded Terms and Section 4.1 (prov:Agent)
> 
> Examples: <mailto:derek@example.org> instead of <mailto:dererk@example.org>
> 
> Section 3.2: Expanded Terms
> 
> Figure 2: Location arrow is not connected to any class.
> 
> Section 3.3: Qualified Terms
> 
> I would consider putting the example before the two tables listing the properties that can be qualified. This makes the section easier to read and to understand, otherwise you get the tables right away and get lost in them.
> 
> "In subfigure a the ... of prov:Usage, which in turn ..." instead of "in trun"
> 
> Section 4
> 
> prov:alternateOf, prov:mentionOf, prov:specializationOf: Definition is wrong, maybe not yet cleared out?
> 
> prov:ActivityInfluence, prov:AgentInfluence, prov:EntityInfluence :Definition is missing here, but they are given a little later at prov:activity, prov:agent and prov:entity. Just a little confusing, when reading the document.
> 
> prov:ProvenanceService, prov:hasAnchor, prov:hasProvenance, prov:hasProvenanceService, prov:provenanceURITemplate: These properties need to be introduced. (They come from PAQ, thus maybe a link to PAQ?)
> 
> Best,
> 
> Sam
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 21:27:51 UTC