Re: prov-wg: Important Last Call Reviewers + Vote + Minutes of June 28, 2012 Telcon

Hi Luc,
since the other issue  thread is closed, I answer in this one.
First of all, sorry for my late response.
>From your answers in :
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/comments/issue-409-daniel.txt
,
some small comments:

   - I think the document is ready. I am okay with section 5.5.3 marked as
   risk, and despite the fact that
   I am not completely comfortable with it, I would like to see if external
   people really find it useful.
   - Comment about usage: the entity could not have affected the activity
   before. In your answer you
   explain that the definition is with respect to a given usage. You and I
   know that, but it is still not
   stated in the document. Please, could it be added?
   - Comment about Table 5:"Revision, Quotation and Primary Source do not
   appear as relationships".
   Okay, now I get the meaning of the table. They are declared as
   subproperties. Thanks.

I am happy with the other answers. I have also reviewed the influence
section, and I think it looks good.
I would argue that the motivating example is not very illustrative, but as
the document says, this property
"may be useful to express queries over provenance information", so I think
it suits it good.

Good job.

Thanks,
Daniel
2012/6/29 Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

> Hi all,
>
> Following Paul's email, prov-dm is now ready for final review before
> LC vote.  Details can be found at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-prov-wg/2012Jun/**0468.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Jun/0468.html>
>
> Cheers,
> Luc
>
>
> On 28/06/12 19:22, Paul Groth wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> You can find the minutes for today's telcon at:
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**meeting/2012-06-28<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-06-28>
>>
>> A couple of important points:
>>
>> * This is for Last Call so we need reviewers. At the telcon, only Luc
>> and I agreed to review the prov-o ontology.  Furthermore, we only had
>> 3 reviewers for the dm. I know many of you couldn't make it, so please
>> volunteer.
>>
>> * We will vote on Last Call at the July 12 Telcon.
>>
>> * The due date for the Reviews is July 6
>>
>> As we approach this important release, I appreciate your contributions
>> on finalizing these documents for public comment.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>
>