W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > July 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-377 (rl-plus-plus-justify): All RL "violations" justified appendix [PROV-O HTML]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:35:28 -0400
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <641BF499-ACDD-4839-825F-640AD6C879A2@rpi.edu>
To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>, Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Satya, Khalid, and Stian

From our notes last week, a point was raised that is not discussed in the current draft:

 ... Stian: some domains are "doubled" one for RL and one for non-RL.
... Khalid: why are we defining the superclasses in addition to the union.
... Tim: hadActivity has two domains: Influence and (Delegation or Derivation or Start) --- Note that the latter is a subclass of the former---


Should we include this consideration?

If so, can Stian and Khalid provide some perspective so that Satya can revise the paragraph?

Thanks,
Tim


[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2012-07-09#Satya
[2] http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#prov-o-owl-profile


On Jul 3, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:

> I'm closing this issue pending review.
> Any +1 or feedback welcome.
> 
> The result is at http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#prov-o-owl-profile
> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> 
>> prov-o team,
>> 
>> Can I get someone to take the lead on this?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>> 
>> On May 16, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> 
>>> PROV-ISSUE-377 (rl-plus-plus-justify): All RL "violations" justified appendix [PROV-O HTML]
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/377
>>> 
>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>>> On product: PROV-O HTML
>>> 
>>> All RL violations reported by http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology#JAR_checker must be described in an appendix in the PROV-O HTML.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 


Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 18:36:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:18 UTC