public-html@w3.org from November 2008 by date

Sunday, 30 November 2008

• Re: Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm Ian Hickson
• Re: Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg] Citing multiple <blockquote> elements in HTML5 Ian Hickson
• <q> omnibus Ian Hickson
• Re: Ratios Do Not Return Errors (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Ian Hickson
• Re: Authoring requirements and default values with progress and meter Ian Hickson

Saturday, 29 November 2008

• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Ian Hickson
• [Bug 6258] New: Changing the encoding doesn't cover non-idempotent navigation bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 6257] New: Please specify document.write()-safe points in the parse bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 6256] New: Mutation event behavior on document.open() unspecified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Mutation events and document.open() Henri Sivonen

Friday, 28 November 2008

• request for input on organizing (ARIA, HTML)-to-API work Al Gilman
• [html-author] Authoring Guide Progress Update Lachlan Hunt

Thursday, 27 November 2008

• [Bug 6254] New: xref errors in the <input> summary table bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 6253] New: <input> bookkeeping aren't consistent bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes Dave Singer
• Re: document.write from event handlers Henri Sivonen
• Re: document.write from event handlers (was: Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node) Henri Sivonen
• document.write from event handlers (was: Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node Boris Zbarsky
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node Henri Sivonen
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node Henri Sivonen

Wednesday, 26 November 2008

• Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing Ian Hickson
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node Jonas Sicking
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node Henri Sivonen
• Re: Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm Ian Hickson
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node Jonas Sicking
• HTMLMediaElement - detecting startup hysterisis Eric Carlson
• Form-associated elements in the parsing algorithm Henri Sivonen
• Database section feedback Ian Hickson
• Re: Text presentation of image maps with <object> (detailed review of Semantics) Ian Hickson
• Image map feedback Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

• Re: Authoring Guide Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Authoring Guide Jonas Sicking
• Re: Authoring Guide (was: Splitting up the spec) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Splitting up the spec Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: PFWG report on @headers status Joshue O Connor
• Re: PFWG report on @headers status Gez Lemon
• Re: PFWG report on @headers status Robert J Burns
• Re: PFWG report on @headers status Laura Carlson
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Lachlan Hunt
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jim Jewett
• Re: Web Forms 2 input type=email (was Re: autosubmit) Ian Hickson
• Line breaks in the placeholder attribute Henri Sivonen
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Moratorium on the spec-splitting discussion Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jim Jewett
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jim Jewett
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Splitting up the spec Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Splitting up the spec Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Splitting up the spec Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jonas Sicking
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Kornel Lesinski

Monday, 24 November 2008

• Re: Splitting up the spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Splitting up the spec Ian Hickson
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Julian Reschke
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Splitting up the spec Julian Reschke
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Splitting up the spec Julian Reschke
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Splitting up the spec Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jonas Sicking
• Re: Splitting up the spec Ian Hickson
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jim Jewett
• Re: Splitting up the spec Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Jim Jewett
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Splitting up the spec Julian Reschke
• Re: Splitting up the spec Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Julian Reschke
• Re: Splitting up the spec Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jonas Sicking
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Ian Hickson
• Re: Splitting up the spec Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jim Jewett
• Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes Pierre-Olivier Latour
• English analogy [was: Re: Splitting up the spec] Jim Jewett
• Re: Splitting up the spec Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification John Kemp
• Re: Splitting up the spec Toby A Inkster
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jim Jewett
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jim Jewett
• Re: Splitting up the spec Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Splitting up the spec Boris Zbarsky
• Re: PFWG report on @headers status Joshue O Connor
• Re: Splitting up the spec Toby A Inkster
• Re: Splitting up the spec Toby A Inkster
• Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Julian Reschke
• Re: Splitting up the spec Julian Reschke
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jonas Sicking
• Re: An HTML language specification Henri Sivonen
• Re: Splitting up the spec Henri Sivonen
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Jim Jewett
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Ian Hickson
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Gavin Sharp

Sunday, 23 November 2008

• Re: An HTML language specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes Eric Carlson
• Re: setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes Philip Jägenstedt
• setting HTMLMediaElement volume and playbackRate attributes Eric Carlson
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Nikunj Mehta
• Re: An HTML language specification John Kemp
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Julian Reschke
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Julian Reschke
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Ian Hickson
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Julian Reschke
• Re: Splitting up the spec Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Smylers
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jim Jewett
• Re: An HTML language specification Jim Jewett
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jim Jewett
• Re: Splitting up the spec - archive info Jim Jewett
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Jim Jewett
• Re: Splitting up the spec Ian Hickson
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jim Jewett
• Re: Splitting up the spec Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jim Jewett
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Jim Jewett
• video: various width/height attributes Jim Jewett
• Re: An HTML language specification Jim Jewett
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jim Jewett
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Jim Jewett

Saturday, 22 November 2008

• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: An HTML language specification Rob Sayre
• Re: An HTML language specification Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• [Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification] Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• HTMLSelectElement.add() Cameron McCormack
• Re: Splitting up the spec Ian Hickson
• HTMLMediaElement defaultPlaybackRate and playbackRate Eric Carlson
• Re: Splitting up the spec Toby A Inkster
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson

Friday, 21 November 2008

• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: An HTML language specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Nikunj Mehta
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Nikunj Mehta
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Julian Reschke
• Re: Splitting up the spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Splitting up the spec Jonas Sicking
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Julian Reschke
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Julian Reschke
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification John Kemp
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: An HTML language specification Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 20 November 2008

• Re: bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate Chris Double

Friday, 21 November 2008

• Re: An HTML language specification Philip Taylor
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification John Kemp
• Re: An HTML language specification Julian Reschke
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: An HTML language specification John Kemp
• Re: Splitting up the spec Smylers
• Re: An HTML language specification Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification James Graham
• Re: An HTML language specification Rob Sayre
• Re: An HTML language specification Henri Sivonen
• Splitting up the spec Jim Jewett
• Re: charter diffs [was: An HTML language spec...] Julian Reschke
• Re: An HTML language specification Rob Sayre
• Re: charter diffs [was: An HTML language spec...] Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Rob Sayre
• Splitting up the spec Jonas Sicking
• charter diffs [was: An HTML language spec...] Dan Connolly

Thursday, 20 November 2008

• Re: An HTML language specification Philip Taylor
• Re: HTMLMediaElement readyState Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Jonas Sicking
• Re: An HTML language specification Andi Sidwell
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Nikunj Mehta
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Jonas Sicking
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Nikunj Mehta
• Re: markup spec [was: Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification?] Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Language Specification Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• markup spec [was: Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification?] Jim Jewett
• Language Specification Dean Edridge
• Re: An HTML language specification Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Philip TAYLOR
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: An HTML language specification Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Dean Edridge
• Re: bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Maciej Stachowiak
• How the markup spec is put together [was: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal?] Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Should we Publish a Langauge Specification? Michael(tm) Smith
• HTMLMediaElement readyState Eric Carlson
• bufferingThrottled and bufferingRate Eric Carlson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Julian Reschke
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Maciej Stachowiak

Wednesday, 19 November 2008

• Re: Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Henri Sivonen
• Who is the Intended Audience of the Markup Spec Proposal? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: document.close() in document.write() Philip Taylor
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Julian Reschke
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 6236] New: scroll bar placement in frames bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Should we Publish a Language Specification? Dean Edridge
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Henri Sivonen
• Re: Should we Publish a Langauge Specification? Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• document.close() in document.write() Henri Sivonen
• Re: Should we Publish a Langauge Specification? Ben Millard
• Re: metadata content Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: An HTML language specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Nikunj Mehta
• Re: An HTML language specification Toby A Inkster
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: An HTML language specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Toby A Inkster
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Maciej Stachowiak

Tuesday, 18 November 2008

• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Dan Connolly
• Re: An HTML language specification Henri Sivonen
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: metadata content Henri Sivonen
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Lee Kowalkowski
• Re: metadata content Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: An HTML language specification Geoffrey Sneddon
• Selectors API: New Last Call Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Dan Connolly
• Minor form enctype errors Philip Taylor
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Philip TAYLOR
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: An HTML language specification Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Julian Reschke

Monday, 17 November 2008

• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke

Tuesday, 18 November 2008

• metadata content Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters Cameron McCormack
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Contexts in which <menu> is allowed Ian Hickson
• Re: checked attribute on non-radio, non-checkbox commands Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 David Orchard
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Nikunj Mehta
• Re: your action? about @headers etc. Ben Millard
• Why "Platform Core" and "HTML5" are in the same spec Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Nikunj Mehta

Monday, 17 November 2008

• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Roy T. Fielding
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: Doctype in "HTML: The Markup Language" Edward O'Connor
• Re: your action? about @headers etc. Al Gilman
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jim Jewett
• Point at which script blocks the parser Henri Sivonen
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Henri Sivonen
• Re: Re-entrant invocation of the tree builder Henri Sivonen
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node Henri Sivonen
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Julian Reschke
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Web sockets: typo Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters Cameron McCormack
• Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: Doctype in "HTML: The Markup Language" Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters Jonas Sicking
• [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters Cameron McCormack
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Håkon Wium Lie
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Harold
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Robert J Burns
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Robert J Burns
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Maciej Stachowiak

Sunday, 16 November 2008

• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Robert J Burns
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Robert J Burns
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: State transitions for media elements Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: An HTML language specification Julian Reschke
• Re: Question about @id validation in XHTML5 Alexandre Alapetite
• Re: Question about @id validation in XHTML5 Henri Sivonen
• Question about @id validation in XHTML5 Alexandre Alapetite
• Re: your action? about @headers etc. Ben Millard
• Re: An HTML language specification Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification James Graham
• Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" Henri Sivonen
• Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" Henri Sivonen
• Escaping text span and character references Henri Sivonen
• Re: "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" Ben Millard
• Nesting optgroups Henri Sivonen
• Doctype in "HTML: The Markup Language" Henri Sivonen
• "HTML document" in "HTML: the markup language" Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: State transitions for media elements Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Jonas Sicking

Saturday, 15 November 2008

• Re: An HTML language specification Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Buffered bytes for media elements Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Julian Reschke
• Re: An HTML language specification Henri Sivonen
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Jonas Sicking
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Robert J Burns
• RE: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Justin James
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Jonas Sicking
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Robert J Burns

Friday, 14 November 2008

• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Robert J Burns
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Ian Hickson
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification Ian Hickson
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Boris Zbarsky
• Re: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification Robert J Burns
• Re: An HTML language specification Philip TAYLOR
• An HTML language specification Mark Baker
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? Daniel Schattenkirchner
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Jonas Sicking
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Jonas Sicking
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Steven Faulkner
• Re: {minutes} HTML WG telcon 2008-11-13 - markup-spec discussion Ben Millard
• Re: {minutes} HTML WG telcon 2008-11-13 - markup-spec discussion Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: {minutes} HTML WG telcon 2008-11-13 - markup-spec discussion Ben Millard

Thursday, 13 November 2008

• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Ian Hickson
• Re: what's the language of a document ? Ian Hickson
• Re: what's the language of a document ? Daniel Glazman
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Mark Baker
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: what's the language of a document ? Ian Hickson
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Philip TAYLOR
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Toby A Inkster
• Re: "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Mark Baker
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Thomas Broyer
• "HTML: The Markup Language" (draft attempt an "HTML producers" spec) Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• what's the language of a document ? Daniel Glazman
• Comments on HTML WG face to face meetings in France Oct 08 Dean Edridge
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags Jonas Sicking
• RE: Workers Justin James
• Re: Selectors Tests Brad Kemper
• Re: Selectors Tests fantasai

Wednesday, 12 November 2008

• RE: Workers Ian Hickson
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Summary: HTML WG October 2008 face-to-face meeting Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Selectors Tests Brad Kemper
• Re: Selectors Tests Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Selectors Tests Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• Re: Parsing problem with misnested tags Simon Pieters
• Prompt, please, into which door i must to knock (was: budget to implement HTML6) Dmitry Turin
• Re: [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events Michael A. Puls II
• RE: Section 1.4.4 proposed text Ian Hickson
• RE: Section 1.4.4 proposed text Chris Wilson
• Re: [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events Ian Hickson
• RE: Section 1.4.4 proposed text Justin James
• Re: Section 1.4.4 proposed text Ian Hickson
• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE Leif Halvard Silli

Tuesday, 11 November 2008

• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE Jirka Kosek
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes Philip Taylor
• Parsing problem with misnested tags Philip Taylor
• Re: willValidate and image controls Ian Hickson
• Re: HTMLOptionElement constructor Ian Hickson
• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE Leif Halvard Silli
• Section 1.4.4 proposed text Chris Wilson
• Likely regrets for Thursday's call Chris Wilson
• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE Jirka Kosek
• [Bug 6216] New: <script> in <select> bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [Bug 6214] New: insertRow without arguments Jonas Sicking
• Re: The compatibility DOCTYPE Jirka Kosek
• The compatibility DOCTYPE Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? Simon Pieters
• RE: Almost Standards Mode still needed? Travis Leithead

Monday, 10 November 2008

• [Bug 6214] New: insertRow without arguments bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 6213] New: Noscript content model with script allows fragment parse errors bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? Henri Sivonen
• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? Maciej Stachowiak

Sunday, 9 November 2008

• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? Daniel Schattenkirchner
• Re: Almost Standards Mode still needed? Henri Sivonen

Saturday, 8 November 2008

• Almost Standards Mode still needed? Daniel Schattenkirchner

Friday, 7 November 2008

• micro-process on @headers and friends [was: Re: how to collaborate with the HTML WG (what works)] Al Gilman
• Re: how to collaborate with the HTML WG (what works) Steven Faulkner
• Re: [whatwg] Context help in Web Forms Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Events and disabled form controls Ian Hickson
• {minutes} 2008-10-24 f2f meeting (day two) Michael(tm) Smith
• {minutes} 2008-10-23 f2f meeting (day one) Michael(tm) Smith
• Updating the HTMLWG Web Pages Ben Millard

Thursday, 6 November 2008

• Re: Nested forms Ian Hickson
• no telcon this week Michael(tm) Smith
• budget to implement HTML6 Dmitry Turin
• RE: budget to implement HTML6 (second answer to Mark Baker) Justin James
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 (second answer to Mark Baker) Julian Reschke
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 (second answer to Mark Baker) Dmitry Turin

Wednesday, 5 November 2008

• Re: <q> Research & Conclusions Ben Millard
• Re: [WF2] HTMLFormElement.accept vs. function accept(){} Ian Hickson
• Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages Ian Hickson
• Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes Ian Hickson
• Re: required radio buttons and checkboxes Ian Hickson
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 Dmitry Turin
• budget to implement HTML6 Dmitry Turin
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 Dmitry Turin
• Re[2]: budget to implement HTML6 Dmitry Turin
• Re: Final thoughts on <q> Ben Millard
• Re: <q> Research & Conclusions Ben Millard

Tuesday, 4 November 2008

• Re: budget to implement HTML6 Marco Neumann
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 Mark Baker
• Re: budget to implement HTML6 Dmitry Turin
• budget to implement HTML6 Dmitry Turin
• how to collaborate with the HTML WG (what works) Al Gilman

Saturday, 1 November 2008

• Re: Conformance requirements for accept-charset Ian Hickson
• Re: External conformance dependency in forms Ian Hickson
• Re: Space in pseudo-BNF for accept attribute for file upload controls Ian Hickson
• Re: <q> vs <p> Ian Hickson
• Re: Final thoughts on <q> Ian Hickson
• RE: <q> Ian Hickson

Last message date: Sunday, 30 November 2008 22:55:38 UTC